, and accepted the version of the accused police officers, according to which the car driven by the applicant on the night of the events had created a traffic obstacle, he had been drunk, refused to abide

Having invited the Government of Sweden to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment, having regard to its obligation under Article 53 (art. 53) of the convention to abide

respondent state to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 27 March 2001, having regard to France’s obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide

respondent state to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 12 April 2001, having regard to Greece’s obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide

State to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 28 March 2000, having regard to Switzerland’s obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide

to inform it of the measures taken following its decisions of 26 January and 21 September 1993, having regard to Germany's obligation under Article 32, paragraph 4 (art. 32-4), of the Convention to abide

respondent state to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 11 October 2001, having regard to Germany’s obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide

respondent state to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 24 October 2000, having regard to France’s obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide

respondent state to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 21 March 2000, having regard to France’s obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide

state to inform it of the measures taken following its decisions of 15 April 1999 and 8 October 1999, having regard to France’s obligation under former Article 32, paragraph 4, of the Convention to abide

to inform it of the measures taken following its decisions of 9 February 1996 and 22 March 1996, having regard to Italy's obligation under Article   32, paragraph   4, of the Convention to abide

respondent state to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 2 August 2000, having regard to France’s obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide

Government of Norway to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 19 February 1996, having regard to Norway’s obligation under Article   53 of the Convention to abide

Netherlands to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 9 February 1995, having regard to the Netherlands' obligation under Article 53 (art. 53) of the Convention to abide

state to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 19 March 2002, having regard to France’s obligation under Article   46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide

);   Having invited the government of the respondent state to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with its obligation under Article   46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide

respondent State to inform it of the measures taken following its decisions of 14 February 2000, having regard to France’s obligation under Article   32, paragraph   4, of the Convention to abide

State to inform it of the measures taken following its decisions of 12 November 1998 and 15 April 1999, having regard to Italy's obligation under former Article 32, paragraph 4, of the Convention to abide

Germany to inform it of the measures taken following its decisions of 18 October 1991 and 15 May 1992, having regard to Germany's obligation under Article 32, paragraph 4 (art. 32-4), of the Convention to abide