The Government did not make any submissions on the merits of this complaint. 24.

The court added that while the applicant had sufficient means to provide the relevant evidence or lodge requests for such evidence, she had failed to make use of them. 9.

The term “malgré nous” describes the 130,000 or so male adults from Alsace and Lorraine who were forcibly conscripted into the German armed forces from 1942 onwards; some 40,000 of them died.

Relying on statements allegedly made during the court hearings by Hospital psychiatrists, according to which on the date of his hospitalisation he had posed no real danger to anyone and his placement in

The court also found that the statements made at the interview were insufficient for it to arrive at any other conclusion given the findings by the Ministry.

His reaction made the officers suspect that he might be in possession of a weapon which he could use against them.

The Government submitted copies of the payment rolls proving the payment of all the travel expenses and the applicants did not make any comment on them. 3.

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

However, reference will still be made to the applicant throughout the present text. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   6 § 1 AND ARTICLE   13 OF THE CONVENTION 7.

    On 13 July 2022 the Valencia First Instance Court no. 24 issued a decision authorising L.’s father to proceed with vaccination.

Those claims had been dismissed by the administrative authorities of the Valencian Community and Murcia, based on several expert reports.

  39335/07) (the eighth applicant); -           Valentina Leonidovna SHEVCHENKO of Vakhrushevo, born in 1955 (no.

five metres distance at all times; (ii)   the prohibition to engage in activities relating to equestrian sport, horse ‑ keeping or breeding, or to possess horses; (iii) the prohibition to make

The BCEA offered to make the payment not as compensation for expropriation, but on the basis of a contract of sale to be entered into by the applicant and the representative of the BCEA. 3.

He also made additional complaints (see below) stemming from the same set of facts. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.

It contended that it had only been partly compensated (see paragraph 4 above) and that the payment had been made six months after the demolition of its property.

above, the Court considers that it has dealt with the main legal questions raised by the case and that there is no need to examine the remaining complaints (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

Consequently, the Court makes no award in this respect. 17.

The first-instance court emphasised that the finding made by the Ministry as to the alleged deficiency (summarised in paragraph 3 above) had been lawful.