Appeals by the applicants against those decisions were dismissed by the judge responsible for the execution of sentences, who found that there was no procedural defect or error of law, taking the view,

Thus, without the agreement of the investigation authorities the Ternopil SFI could not provide the applicant NGO with the information requested.

In the Constitutional Court’s view, the courts’ evidence assessment had not been arbitrary or grossly unfair and, therefore, the latter court was not entitled to interfere with those independent judicial

Moreover, such a possibility would ensure that traffickers were not able to enjoy the fruits of their offences, thus reducing the economic incentives to commit them.

Consequently, the six-month time‑limit had restarted in respect of the complaint concerning the use of those statements.

The domestic courts’ finding that the applicant had threatened the State with terrorist acts had thus been arbitrary.

s accounts, thus neglecting his liability to pay employer's contributions. He had also given the tax authorities false information, thus avoiding the payment of value-added tax.

Article 20 lists those parties as the liquidator, the creditors’ committee, the creditor, etc.

That being so, the interference had also been intended to protect the dignity of those persons and thus the dignity of their descendants.

After the collapse of the USSR, those resources were not shared; they remained the property of the Russian Federation.

been physical attacks on party members or those associated with it and their communications had been intercepted.

Just satisfaction had thus not been sought with a view to compensating the State for a violation of its rights but for the benefit of individual victims.

The court expressly noted that those conclusions were not disputed by the parties.

Indeed, a violation of the Convention may concern important questions of principle and thus cause a significant disadvantage without affecting pecuniary interest.

It was thus conditional as the applicant would profit from the reduction of the prison sentence only in case he recommitted a criminal offence within the probation period.

The lawmaker’s intention was to discharge those duties through a State-owned non-profit book distribution company.

Under further conditions, those plots were subject to restitution in favour of the pre-collectivisation owners.

It considered that no compensation was due to the first applicant who only had the bare ownership of a quarter of the property and thus did not perceive any rent.

Her complaints had thus given rise to a credible suspicion that she had been held in conditions of domestic servitude, which in turn placed the domestic authorities under an obligation to investigate those