CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1127DEC000425102
27 novembre 2003
In a judgment of 21 June 1989, the Criminal Court of Judicial Police found the applicant guilty of the charge brought against him and ordered him to pay a fine of 50 Maltese Lire (Lm).
Page 21 sur 692
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0304JUD002824504
4 mars 2010
before he has been proved guilty according to law.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-198330
11 octobre 2019
40523/08, 8 April 2010 the applicant emphasised that he had not been found guilty of any offence and that the principle of presumption of innocence had been breached. 29.
cr
6079a8989ba5988459c4e24e
4 novembre 1969
REJET des pourvois de la société Guilde internationale du disque et de la société Mécanelex parties civiles contre un arrêt de la Cour d'appel de Paris du 5 avril 1968 qui a relaxé X..., Y..., Z..., A.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1105JUD003543797
5 novembre 2002
Thereupon, the Regional Court supplemented the minutes accordingly, stating that the evidence before it did not carry a finding of guilt.
ECLI:CEDH:001-127803
11 février 2009
During the trial the applicant pleaded not guilty.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1018JUD002110707
18 octobre 2016
The Government also challenged the applicant’s argument that the labour court had mentioned or had regard to her guilt under criminal law. 21.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1108DEC001271004
8 novembre 2005
They pleaded guilty to conspiracy to steal but not guilty to conspiracy to rob. The only issue at trial was, therefore, whether there was a conspiracy to rob. The trial lasted three months.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0902DEC001946692
2 septembre 1994
He added that, should the applicant not plead guilty, the trial could only be continued in autumn 1991.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1016DEC002091992
16 octobre 1995
s heirs were liable to pay the incurred fine, irrespective of their personal guilt.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1005DEC001238086
5 octobre 1988
Article 6 para. 2 (Art. 6-2) guarantees that "everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law"
5 / 3 SSR
CETAT:CETATEXT000007840017
4 janvier 1995
Salat-Baroux, Maître des Requêtes, - les observations de Me Delvolvé, avocat de la SOCIETE "ETABLISSEMENTS GUILLIER", - les conclusions de M.
ECLI:CEDH:001-161081
4 février 2016
At 3 p.m. on 10 February 2014 the applicant was interviewed by an investigator and pleaded guilty.
ECLI:CEDH:001-233696
15 avril 2024
It also found the applicant guilty under Article 178 § 3 (1) of the CC and sentenced her to five years’ imprisonment.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0829JUD002091992
29 août 1997
Rather, it was the guilt of the deceased which had to be demonstrated.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0913JUD003573007
13 septembre 2011
The prosecution offered no evidence in respect of the burglary charge and a not guilty verdict was recorded.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0627REP001873191
27 juin 1994
The refusal of the accused to give evidence on his own behalf does not in itself indicate guilt.
2ème Chambre
DTA_2301363_20260304
4 mars 2026
Guillos de réinstruire sa demande sous astreinte ; 3°) de mettre à la charge de la commune de Guillos une somme de 1 200 euros en application de l’article L. 761-1 du code de justice administrative
ECLI:CEDH:001-111050
5 avril 2012
On 28 November 2005 the Engels Town Court found the applicant guilty as charged and sentenced him to ten years’ imprisonment.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3384
13 avril 2006
The Criminal Court found the applicant guilty and gave him a suspended sentence of two years’ imprisonment, also ordering him to pay a fine and damages.