CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0827JUD002879110
27 août 2024
In cases where the family is in detention, while mutual enjoyment by parent and child of each other’s company constitutes a fundamental element of family life, it cannot be inferred from this that the
Page 21 sur 1237
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2157
3 avril 2012
Law – Article 8: The attempt to compel the applicant to give evidence against her long-term partner had interfered with her right to respect for her family life.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0630JUD007087911
30 juin 2020
RELEVANT LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND PRACTICE Family Code 27 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1209JUD002507518
9 décembre 2021
No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life)
ECLI:CEDH:002-11933
26 avril 2018
Norway - 27496/15 Judgment 26.4.2018 [Section V] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for family life Exceptional circumstances justifying adoption of children, victims of domestic violence, by foster parents
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0328JUD001966420
28 mars 2024
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0730JUD000094812
30 juillet 2013
of a residence permit to the family member.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0907JUD004370114
7 septembre 2017
It further noted that there were advantages to a child moving to a foster home comprising family members. X would in that case be placed within the family network.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0706JUD001153619
6 juillet 2021
Family Code of the Russian Federation 28.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1201JUD007703611
1 décembre 2016
The applicant and his family spoke Arabic. 37.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0828JUD000861011
28 août 2018
It was further decided that the whole family should undergo psychiatric examinations. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0503JUD003056019
3 mai 2022
Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1010JUD002650420
10 octobre 2023
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0402JUD002794510
2 avril 2015
family ( Slivenko v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0214JUD001047721
14 février 2023
The family lived in Vilnius. 5 . In February 2017 the applicant and O. divorced.
ECLI:CEDH:002-12294
10 janvier 2019
The Family Court also ordered the applicants to hand their children over to the youth welfare office, which would enforce the rules on compulsory school attendance.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0428JUD002010613
28 avril 2016
On 11 July 2005 the Family Court granted this request.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1029JUD006706811
29 octobre 2019
On the other hand, it was also obvious that the best interests of the child were to grow with his family, unless it was proven that the family was inappropriate, because to do otherwise would mean separating
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0621JUD001721920
21 juin 2022
Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life ... 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0110JUD001358907
10 janvier 2012
The fact that during the marriage it was the mother who dedicated more time to the children was because she had more free time available, and also because traditionally, in any family, it is the mother