submitted by the Governments at the request of the Judge Rapporteur pursuant to Rule 49 § 2 (a) of the Rules of Court and the observations in reply submitted by the applicants, Having deliberated, decides

G. denied that he had hit the applicant on the stairs or that he had told him to apologise to the pupil's father or else face dismissal.

However, he denied having been beaten by the other detainees. According to him, the police officer removed him from the cell as soon as one of the detainees started making threats to him.

    The Government denied State responsibility for Alis Zubirayev’s disappearance and submitted that most probably he had been kidnapped by unidentified armed men belonging to illegal armed groups

The court decides that [the applicant’s] detention should be extended to 1 October 2002.” The applicant appealed.

He denied any other recent injury, surgery or illness. During his detention, JM visited the prison doctor three times complaining of trouble sleeping (17, 22 and 24 August 2007).

M.M. had no information to give them about the killing of Milan Zdjelar and denied any involvement of his unit in the killing of civilians during Operation Storm. 26.

Thus, it decides to join this objection to the merits of the case and considers that the issue falls to be examined below. II.

Edwards Frais, Liverpool.   3.    The application is directed against the United Kingdom.   The respondent Government were represented by their Agent, Mr. M.C.

On 23   December 2010 the Court of Magistrates, following an objection by the Attorney General, denied the request on the basis that it should not alter the decision of the Criminal Court. 25.

In the course of their interrogations, the aforementioned Allala Bousselmi, Fahrat Saïdi and Sadok Hamza denied all the accusations levelled against them, although they were concurring and had been made

    The applicants alleged, in particular, that they were denied a fair trial in breach of Article 6 of the Convention on account of the prosecution's use of statements which they had been compelled

    On 20 February 2003 the Sisak Police also interviewed M.S., who denied any involvement in the abduction and killing of V.B. 17.

As he had been denied formal status as a suspect, he could not defend himself properly.

The inquiry concluded that senior officer Z. and two officers had been interviewed and had denied torturing Mr   I. 27.

This provision replaced the one contained in section 21(4), which provided that the court could decide to conduct the proceedings in camera of its own motion or on an application by a party.

observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant as well as to the parties’ responses to questions raised by the Court, Having deliberated, decides

In his evidence the applicant admitted that when arrested on that occasion he had been dealing in drugs, but denied possession of the firearm. 24.

Turkey [GC], no. 48939/99, § 147, ECHR 2004 ‑ XII; Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom , no. 46477/99, § 97, ECHR 2002 ‑ II; Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95