CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

4 324 résultats pour « Derrendinger »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0620DEC004431998

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2000

20 juin 2000

Moreover, the various regional notary chambers (of which there are sometimes more than one per region) require different membership fees depending on the decision of the general assembly of members.

Source officielle

Page 21 sur 217

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0104DEC005483107

Admin. suprême

4 janvier 2012

4 janvier 2012

    According to the applicants, depending on the period and the relevant law in force, the maximum rent permissible represented between 5% and 13% of the level of rent applicable in respect

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0701DEC003844097

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 1998

1 juillet 1998

       The amount of costs incurred by the applicant in defending himself was about £535,000.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0603DEC002013602

Admin. suprême

3 juin 2008

3 juin 2008

prosecutor had regard to the case ‑ law of the Supreme Court concerning the scope of freedom of expression in judicial proceedings and considered that the applicant could not be blamed for defending

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14185

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 2023

14 septembre 2023

It accepted nonetheless that the applicants had been affected by those amendments, and the effects on their personal situation had varied depending on their level of Latvian and in which educational programme

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0912JUD004010615

Admin. suprême

12 septembre 2024

12 septembre 2024

  207 of 30   March   2022) now enabled data subjects to request either “full” or “abbreviated” versions of extracts from the police register, depending on the purpose for which they were

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1964

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2008

8 juillet 2008

for its decision, together with the lack of clearly defined objective criteria governing the lifting of immunity, would effectively deprive all the parties concerned by the decision of the means of defending

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0607DEC005255999

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2001

7 juin 2001

According to these laws municipalities can either get a subsidy or be obliged to pay a fee depending on their costs for different public services, e.g. child care, geriatric care, education and road maintenance

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-114589

Admin. suprême

17 octobre 2012

17 octobre 2012

submit that it is incumbent on the military forces to monitor the psychology of a soldier, to ensure that he should receive adequate treatment if he encounters problems and to consider all measures depending

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0912DEC005774415

Admin. suprême

12 septembre 2017

12 septembre 2017

companies, however, the Court established that the constitutional appeal was to be deemed as an effective domestic remedy starting with 22   June   2012 and 4 October 2013, respectively depending

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-178976

Admin. suprême

31 octobre 2017

31 octobre 2017

allowing the eighth applicant to import the religious literature in the quantities requested, the Committee had lawfully carried out its obligations pursuant to the legislation for the purposes of defending

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0127DEC006074408

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2015

27 janvier 2015

The Court also stated that its position may be subject to review in the future, depending in particular on the domestic courts’ capacity to establish consistent practice under the new law in line with

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13261

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2021

27 mai 2021

Law – Article 8: (a) Admissibility – (i) Family life – The existence or non-existence of “family life” was essentially a question of fact depending upon the existence of close personal ties ( K. and T.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13303

Admin. suprême

15 juin 2021

15 juin 2021

specified in their decisions whether, during the period between the publication of the disputed content and the initiation of the disciplinary proceedings, which had been approximately six to nine months depending

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0413JUD000511703

Admin. suprême

13 avril 2006

13 avril 2006

Osmanov, confirmed that it was the applicant’s genuine wish to withdraw the application because she had apparently lost any interest in defending her rights both on the domestic and international level

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0705DEC001757820

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2022

5 juillet 2022

Stažnik, and to declare inadmissible the remainder of the application; the observations submitted by the respondent Government; the comments submitted by the non-governmental organisations Alliance Defending

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13881

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2022

10 novembre 2022

Regarding the autonomous concept of “penalty” within the meaning of Article   7, the Court did not consider that its interpretation could be substantially different depending on whether the measure

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14345

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2024

20 juin 2024

recognised that in certain situations, by reason of a state of powerlessness caused, for example, by alcohol, drugs, illness or disability, a victim might be incapable of expressing his or her wishes or of defending

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7680

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2013

9 juillet 2013

and freedom of expression among its members, ensuring that one of its members took part in the Holy Synod, requesting an annual financial report from the archbishop and using strikes as a means of defending

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0127DEC000519906

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2015

27 janvier 2015

The Court also stated that its position may be subject to review in the future, depending in particular on the domestic courts’ capacity to establish consistent practice under the new law in line with

Source officielle