CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0417JUD002098110
17 avril 2014
Damage 51.
Page 21 sur 118
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1550080-1627613
6 janvier 2006
The Court awarded Mr Harazin EUR 2,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage and EUR 1,000 for costs and expenses.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0219JUD001360105
19 février 2013
Damage 55. The applicant claimed 100,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non ‑ pecuniary damage. 56.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-159429
23 novembre 2015
TRL 10,000,000,000 (approximately EUR 22,750) of that sum was requested in respect of non-pecuniary damage and TRL 100,000,000 (approximately EUR 230) for pecuniary damage.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-5908
18 juillet 2000
The applicant alleges that his brother was killed by or with the connivance of the law-enforcement agencies because of his political activities.
ECLI:CEDH:002-4699
25 septembre 2003
The applicant claimed compensation from the Chief Constable for having been detained, and subsequently complained to the Regional Prosecutor and to the Prosecutor General, but her request was not successful
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-71164
26 octobre 2005
#xa0; held that the government of the respondent state was to pay the applicant, within three months from the date at which the judgment became final, 1 500 euros in respect of non-pecuniary damage
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0119JUD004638999
19 janvier 2006
Damage 36. The applicant company claimed EUR 55,000, which amount it based on the title of non- pecuniary damage and pecuniary damage.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0906DEC002208393
6 septembre 1994
A medical report dated May 1991 stated that the second applicant suffered severe psychological damage including an inability to trust others, constant mood swings, sleep difficulties and anxiety.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1011JUD005269099
11 octobre 2005
If damage has been caused by a failure to give a ruling ( orzeczenie ) or decision ( decyzja ) where there is a statutory duty to give them, reparation for [the damage] may be sought after
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0211JUD002179605
11 février 2014
The certificate stated that the child (born in 1992) suffered from chronic asthma and that she was in need of her parent’s constant care. 9.
comm
613721b7cd580146773f66f8
20 octobre 1992
d'appel de Paris (16e chambre, section B), au profit de : 1°/ La société L'Apothéose, dont le siège est ... à Epinay-sur-Seine (Seine-Saint-Denis), 2°/ Mme Annette F..., épouse D..., demeurant ... à Dammarie-les-Lys
Cour d'Appel
DBVQ-V-B7C-EN2W Société AL-SAHBA FOODSTUFF VEGETABLESc/SARL TIFANETTE
6253cdb6bd3db21cbdd943d8
12 février 2019
Il est constant que la Sarl Tifanette s'est rendue sur place au Qatar le 15 novembre 2012 et a examiné les quatre premiers containers.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0607DEC004647799
7 juin 2001
If there is not dependency, there is no pecuniary loss to recover as damages. Bereavement damages (fixed at £7,500) are only available to the parents of a child under the age of 18 (section 1A(2)).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0416DEC003903097
16 avril 2002
stated that the Chief Constable would however do so if ordered by a court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1008JUD001175103
8 octobre 2009
Pecuniary damage 52. The applicants each claimed 860 euros (EUR) as compensation in respect of pecuniary damage.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0723JUD000075605
23 juillet 2009
Damage 37.
ECLI:CEDH:003-1384107-1450765
30 juin 2005
Under Article 41 (just satisfaction), the Court awarded 6,000 euros (EUR) for non-pecuniary damage to the applicants jointly in Gika and Others v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1102JUD001596902
2 novembre 2006
Damage 38.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1020JUD002025620
20 octobre 2022
Relativity of the doctrine of proven damage means that there was a transfer of the burden of proof from the Claimant onto the Defendant that the Defendant is not responsible for this damage ... ...