CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-220888
18 octobre 2022
Relying on Article 6 of the Convention the applicants complained that the national courts had violated their right to a fair hearing because in dismissing their tort law action, the courts had omitted
Page 21 sur 1499
1ère chambre
DTA_2304801_20231010
10 octobre 2023
B A, représenté par Me Bechaux, avocate, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler pour excès de pouvoir les décisions du 13 février 2023 par lesquelles la préfète du Rhône a rejeté sa demande de titre de
Sécurité sociale
60354f5872c138784c30ee47
3 mai 2016
[Localité 2] Représentée par Madame [F] [S], munie d'un pouvoir DÉBATS EN AUDIENCE PUBLIQUE DU : 08 Mars 2016 COMPOSITION DE LA COUR LORS DES DÉBATS ET DU DÉLIBÉRÉ : Jean-Louis BERNAUD
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0314DEC003737197
14 mars 2000
It was impossible for the applicant to represent himself because defamation proceedings are very complex for a layman, who moreover has linguistic difficulties.
ECLI:CEDH:001-188843
27 novembre 2018
The court held that it could not conclude that because of A.P.’s actions some evidence or a possibility to establish the guilty persons had been lost.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1631
10 mars 2009
She applied for regularisation of her residence status, partly because she and her husband, a Congolese national, had separated, and partly because the couple’s children, who were legal residents, lived
ECLI:CEDH:001-177368
4 septembre 2017
On 6 September 2012 his two brothers were allegedly arrested on charges of terrorism purportedly because of their belonging to Sunny Islam.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-87777
25 juin 2008
II against France Introductory case summary This case concerns a breach to the principle of equality of arms, during a trial before a Cour d'assises because his defence counsel was
ECLI:CEDH:001-111858
14 juin 2012
On 31 March and 6 April 2009 the police informed the local Interior Department that the applicant could not be administratively removed to Georgia because he did not have identity documents.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0323DEC003575697
23 mars 1999
On 11 February 1993, the hearing was postponed to 6 May 1993 because the first applicant could not attend.
ECLI:CEDH:002-11327
6 septembre 2016
Furthermore, because of the refusal of residential care centres and psychiatric hospitals to admit him, he has remained in detention without any realistic prospect of treatment in an outside institution
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0615JUD002289203
15 juin 2006
However, it was also adjourned because the applicant was ill. 11.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920DEC005433710
20 septembre 2011
On 18 January 2007 the Znojmo District Court dismissed the applicant’s claim seeking an official declaration that the Czech Republic was still the owner of the plot of land, because in the meantime the
ECLI:CEDH:001-126958
11 septembre 2013
(c) because his remand lacked justification on any other concrete ground; (iv) that his remand on 29 July 2011 was unlawful and arbitrary (a) because the courts have failed to appreciate
CASELAW;DECISIONS;SCREENINGPANEL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-93
15 janvier 1997
effective remedy in the domestic courts in respect of a complaint about the length of proceedings; (iv) Articles 5 and 10 of the Convention (art. 5, art. 10) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (P1-1) (because
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0709DEC004548899
9 juillet 2002
A hearing scheduled for 7 May 1997 did not take place because the lawyers of the Naples Bar Association were on strike.
ECLI:CEDH:001-114722
24 octobre 2012
With decision of 3 March 2009 the FOM revoked the asylum granted to the applicant because he was sentenced for a crime (the killing of his wife).
ECLI:CEDH:001-159292
18 novembre 2015
On 27 June 2011 the police proposed the termination of the investigation because no elements of a crime had been identified.
1 / 4 SSR
CETAT:CETATEXT000007835425
17 décembre 1993
ASTRA-FRANCE", dont le siège est à Nanterre (92025), Avenir Ouest - ..., représentée par son président-directeur général en exercice, demeurant en cette qualité audit siège et la société anonyme "LABORATOIRES BEECHAM
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0212DEC002829203
12 février 2009
The second applicant The Government argued that the second applicant’s complaint was inadmissible because Article 6 had not applied to the proceedings in question, because the second applicant