She submitted that she had made a prima facie case that her sons had been abducted and killed by State agents and that the essential facts underlying her complaint had not been challenged by the Government

:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .s60570E66 { width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } FIRST SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 32042/02 by Alexander

Alexander Blücher died in 1974 after making a will appointing the applicant as his heir.

She further claimed that on 21   August 2018 she had gone to France with the children. She stated that she had contacted X to let him know where they were, but that X had not visited them. 25.

She made a recommendation “for further referral to a psychiatrist”. 27 .

Austria (No. 2), The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President,   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos,   Ksenija

others against Austria The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 7   April   2015 as a Committee composed of:   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President,   Linos-Alexandre

Sur le plan professionnel, le requérant, qui déclare travailler en France au sein de la société Sun Shine de février 2018 à octobre 2019, de la société MB Transport de novembre 2019 à janvier 2020, de

She also argued that, contrary to Article 13 of the Convention, she had no available domestic remedies against the violations claimed, in particular those under Articles 2 and 3.

She also saw a group of men in camouflage uniforms exit the building. Among them she identified three of the men who had fetched her son.

She signed the interview record without carefully reading it because she trusted that B. would do the necessary to find her brother. 28 .

She also sought damages and salary arrears. 6.

It is not clear whether she was allowed to read the court order. 17.

When she said that she was a ‘lesbian’ he grabbed her with both of his hands and pushed her against a wall.

She held that the driver of the jeep, whose actions had resulted only in bruising, could not be held responsible for the killing as he had been unable to see Carlo, given the confusion prevailing around

She chose to exercise her right to silence.

She had no time to meet the applicant on 9 or 10 February 2006.

Alexandre , avocat,   Counsel . The Court heard addresses by Miss Picard, Mr Bourgoin, Mr Weitzel and Mr Alexandre, and also replies to questions put by it and by one of its members.

She was immediately admitted to hospital where, after four days of intense suffering, she died. 6.