sitting on 11   September 2012 as a Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Anatoly Kovler,   Peer Lorenzen,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Linos-Alexandre

Poland, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, President,   Krzysztof Wojtyczek,   Armen Harutyunyan, judges

SECTION DECISION Application no. 12792/13 Aurelia WYSOWSKA against Poland The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 23   January 2018 as a Chamber composed of:   Linos-Alexandre

    The applicants were represented by their only son, Mr Alexandre Reichardt. The Romanian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Răzvan-Horaţiu Radu.

After a while it became known that many of them had contracted health problems.

  The Court held unanimously that there had been: a violation of Article 3 (prohibition of torture) of the European Convention on Human Rights because the applicants were tortured while in detention

Convicted for speeding by Austrian courts in 2003, he complains that the courts found him guilty only because of his refusal to disclose the identity of the person who had driven his car at the time in

    On 11 December 2017 the applicant requested that the criminal investigation be transferred to another prosecutor’s office because the one in charge at the time was not diligent enough. 32

d'appel du 25 juin 2021 APPELANTE : [H] [W] [X] épouse [B] née le [Date naissance 2] 1954 à [Localité 6] de nationalité Française Retraitée, demeurant [Adresse 5] Représentée par Me Alexandre

Assesseur employeur : Madame Caroline GUERIN Assesseur salarié : Madame Emilie BERAUD Assistés lors des débats par M. Yannik DESPREZ, greffier.

Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Khanlar Hajiyev, President,   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos,   Dmitry Dedov, judges, and André

    On 25 January 2006 the Civil Court, in its constitutional jurisdiction, found that the said provisions were in violation of the Maltese Constitution, because they discriminated against the

Police officers Ioan Moga, Alexandru Şuşcă and Florin Nicu Drăghici had taken hold of her, sprayed pepper in her face and then proceeded to beat her badly.

The removal became effective on 5 October 2018 and she was granted severance pay amounting to one month’s salary (see paragraphs   46 and 47 below).

    The applicants argued that they were entitled to claim to be the victim of a violation because they had no effective remedy at their disposal. 48.

    The AAAS submitted that, because all their efforts to launch a ministerial discussion aiming to find solutions for the complex issue raised by the payment of such large amounts of money which

of loss of salary, and non-pecuniary damage on account of mental suffering in the form of continuing stress because of being held in a detention facility, ... a special institution with a strict regime

The judicial authorisation is not amenable to an appeal at the stage by the individual affected because of the covert nature of operational-search measures.

This is because, according to the well-established case-law, if damage has been caused by a criminal offence but no criminal proceedings have been instituted or concluded against the perpetrator because