CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0706DEC003408796
6 juillet 1999
The Prosecutor General and prosecutors subordinate to him shall carry out the[ir] duties set out in Section 2 by [the following means]: (1) carrying out and supervising the
Page 20 sur 229
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1010JUD003454106
10 octobre 2013
Summaries of the relevant facts for each complaint are set out below.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0704JUD005856817
4 juillet 2024
The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 4.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0704JUD004384211
4 juillet 2019
Unusually, therefore, the letter of 16 May 2017 did not – as it would normally have done – include express instructions to the applicant company to set out and quantify its claim for just
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0131DEC001967316
31 janvier 2017
The legal costs of the Abbey and of RD would be taken out of the royalties due to Arambe from the second run.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0302REP001760291
2 mars 1995
Hauschildt judgment, loc. cit., para. 48; Thorgeir Thorgeirsson judgment, loc. cit., para. 51, Fey judgment, loc. cit., para. 30; Padovani judgment, loc. cit., para. 27; Nortier judgment of 24 August 1993
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-14474
20 mai 2025
1) Effective control over the area in question – The present case was in no way comparable to those in which the Court had previously recognised the exercise of extraterritorial jurisdiction ratione loci
ECLI:CEDH:002-14199
12 septembre 2023
Azerbaijan for alleged Convention violations during “Four-Day War” on territory beyond the line of contact between Azerbaijan and the “Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh”: inadmissible (incompatible ratione loci
ECLI:CEDH:002-14193
Armenia for alleged Convention violations during “Four-Day War” on territory beyond the line of contact between Azerbaijan and the “Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh”: inadmissible (incompatible ratione loci
ECLI:CEDH:002-14195
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2120631-2249597
25 septembre 2007
Loncke v. Belgium (no. 20656/03) Violation of Article 6 § 1 (fairness) The applicant, Jules Loncke, is a Belgian national who was born in 1935 and lives in Bruges (Belgium).
ECLI:CEDH:002-14197
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0228DEC002725103
28 février 2008
After 15 November 2002 the applicants continued to look for their relatives.
ECLI:CEDH:003-2659940-2906542
10 mars 2009
It observed that the applicant, an engineer, had not made any effort to look for a job to be able to pay the maintenance and had not shown that it was impossible to find one.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0408DEC001557318
8 avril 2021
THE LAW The Court does not consider it necessary to address the question as to the locus standi of the applicant’s mother in the proceedings before it because the application is in any event inadmissible
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0408DEC002733104
Accordingly, the application should be struck out of the list of cases as regards the complaint concerning the restitution of the property, raised under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020DEC003189305
20 octobre 2009
Moreover, they did not have any friends or relatives in Liberia who could look after them pending the outcome of a visa application, their mother could not be asked to accompany them as she had built up
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0217DEC002609907
17 février 2009
On 2 October 2002 the Gdańsk Regional Court found that it was not competent ratione loci to examine the case and ordered that it be transferred to the Warsaw Regional Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0701DEC000713707
1 juillet 2008
According to the applicant, she did not have any relatives in Yugoslavia who could look after her pending the outcome of a visa application, and her relatives in the Netherlands could not accompany her
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-144701
13 mai 2014
On an unspecified date the investigative authorities decided to look into the matter once again.