CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

4 572 résultats pour « lock out »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0706DEC003408796

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 1999

6 juillet 1999

  The Prosecutor General and prosecutors subordinate to him shall carry out the[ir] duties set out in Section 2 by [the following means]:     (1)   carrying out and supervising the

Page 20 sur 229

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1010JUD003454106

Admin. suprême

10 octobre 2013

10 octobre 2013

    Summaries of the relevant facts for each complaint are set out below.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0704JUD005856817

Admin. suprême

4 juillet 2024

4 juillet 2024

    The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0704JUD004384211

Admin. suprême

4 juillet 2019

4 juillet 2019

    Unusually, therefore, the letter of 16 May 2017 did not – as it would normally have done – include express instructions to the applicant company to set out and quantify its claim for just

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0131DEC001967316

Admin. suprême

31 janvier 2017

31 janvier 2017

The legal costs of the Abbey and of RD would be taken out of the royalties due to Arambe from the second run.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0302REP001760291

Admin. suprême

2 mars 1995

2 mars 1995

Hauschildt judgment, loc. cit., para. 48; Thorgeir Thorgeirsson judgment, loc. cit., para. 51, Fey judgment, loc. cit., para. 30; Padovani judgment, loc. cit., para. 27; Nortier judgment of 24 August 1993

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14474

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2025

20 mai 2025

1) Effective control over the area in question – The present case was in no way comparable to those in which the Court had previously recognised the exercise of extraterritorial jurisdiction ratione loci

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14199

Admin. suprême

12 septembre 2023

12 septembre 2023

Azerbaijan for alleged Convention violations during “Four-Day War” on territory beyond the line of contact between Azerbaijan and the “Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh”: inadmissible (incompatible ratione loci

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14193

Admin. suprême

12 septembre 2023

12 septembre 2023

Armenia for alleged Convention violations during “Four-Day War” on territory beyond the line of contact between Azerbaijan and the “Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh”: inadmissible (incompatible ratione loci

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14195

Admin. suprême

12 septembre 2023

12 septembre 2023

Armenia for alleged Convention violations during “Four-Day War” on territory beyond the line of contact between Azerbaijan and the “Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh”: inadmissible (incompatible ratione loci

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2120631-2249597

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2007

25 septembre 2007

  Loncke v. Belgium (no. 20656/03)   Violation of Article 6 § 1 (fairness) The applicant, Jules   Loncke, is a Belgian national who was born in 1935 and lives in Bruges (Belgium).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14197

Admin. suprême

12 septembre 2023

12 septembre 2023

Azerbaijan for alleged Convention violations during “Four-Day War” on territory beyond the line of contact between Azerbaijan and the “Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh”: inadmissible (incompatible ratione loci

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0228DEC002725103

Admin. suprême

28 février 2008

28 février 2008

After 15 November 2002 the applicants continued to look for their relatives.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2659940-2906542

Admin. suprême

10 mars 2009

10 mars 2009

It observed that the applicant, an engineer, had not made any effort to look for a job to be able to pay the maintenance and had not shown that it was impossible to find one.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0408DEC001557318

Admin. suprême

8 avril 2021

8 avril 2021

THE LAW The Court does not consider it necessary to address the question as to the locus standi of the applicant’s mother in the proceedings before it because the application is in any event inadmissible

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0408DEC002733104

Admin. suprême

8 avril 2021

8 avril 2021

    Accordingly, the application should be struck out of the list of cases as regards the complaint concerning the restitution of the property, raised under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020DEC003189305

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2009

20 octobre 2009

Moreover, they did not have any friends or relatives in Liberia who could look after them pending the outcome of a visa application, their mother could not be asked to accompany them as she had built up

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0217DEC002609907

Admin. suprême

17 février 2009

17 février 2009

On 2 October 2002 the Gdańsk Regional Court found that it was not competent ratione loci to examine the case and ordered that it be transferred to the Warsaw Regional Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0701DEC000713707

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 2008

1 juillet 2008

According to the applicant, she did not have any relatives in Yugoslavia who could look after her pending the outcome of a visa application, and her relatives in the Netherlands could not accompany her

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-144701

Admin. suprême

13 mai 2014

13 mai 2014

On an unspecified date the investigative authorities decided to look into the matter once again.

Source officielle