and unlawful detention in a psychiatric facility”.

L’article 4-1 dispose que celui qui demande l’ouverture d’une procédure de faillite doit étayer sa demande par des documents pertinents et les faits témoignant de la faillite du débiteur. 34.

    The applicant’s medical records from his stay at this facility indicate that his medical condition was regularly monitored, but sometimes not every single day.

Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Facility Start and end date Duration Sq. m per inmate Specific grievances Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage

    The Court observes at the outset that the applicant complained of appalling conditions of his detention in two separate detention facilities, the Ukhta Town temporary detention unit and facility

Other documents and photographs, related to air, food, water quality control, pest control, temperature and luminosity measurements, bathing facilities, privacy of toilet, laundry services etc., should

A l’époque des faits, il était commerçant et résidait à Diyarbakır (Turquie).

faillite, les saisies des biens du failli sont levées et de nouvelles saisies des biens de celui-ci sont interdites ( не допускается ). 44 .

    The applicant’s state of health In September 2002 the applicant was transferred to medical detention facility no.

    In some applications the Government submitted that the applicants had failed to exhaust domestic remedies, as they had not sought compensation before the civil courts for damage allegedly

He argued in particular that both facilities had been overcrowded and that he had not been allowed access to outdoor exercise throughout his detention in either facility.

regarding the two detention facilities and therefore accepted Mr Kostadinov’s allegations to be valid.

The Government maintained that the courts had rightly refused to award compensation, as no fault on the part of the facility personnel could have been established.

The applicants were placed in detention facility IZ ‑ 37/1 in Ivanovo.

  On 13-14/12/2022 the applicant was transported from Kyiv Pre-Trial Detention Facility to Dnipro Pre-Trial Detention Facility.

In particular, the Court observes that, in reply to a prima facie case of inadequate conditions of detention, complained of by the applicants, the Government have failed to provide any primary evidence

En faits : Il convient de rappeler qu'à l'audience, le Ministère public a, en reprenant les termes de sa requête, sollicité à l'encontre de Madame [L] [R] [I] [O] [K], une mesure de faillite personnelle

que le défendeur était en faillite.

INSTRUISANT LES LECTEURS DES CONSEQUENCES DE CE JUGEMENT DECLARATIF DE FAILLITE; AUX MOTIFS, D'UNE PART, QUE LA PREUVE DE LA REALITE DES FAITS N'AURAIT PAS ETE RAPPORTEE DANS LES FORMES ET DELAIS DE