Court’s assessment of the person’s standing to maintain the application on behalf of a deceased, what is important is not whether the rights at issue are transferable to the heirs but whether the victim made

The Government informed the Court that they proposed to make unilateral declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints.

:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } FIRST SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 70142/01 by Valentin

However, according to the applicant, those proceedings were instituted only after he had made several pertinent complaints to the court.

    The second applicant made several written complaints to the authorities regarding the events set out above.

With regard to application no. 16108/11, the applicant also argued that, in the course of previous negotiations, the municipality had made a binding offer of compensation. 5.

    The court then addressed the submissions made on behalf of the applicant by special counsel.

The applicant made a series of complaints but the conviction was nevertheless confirmed in a decision served on the applicant’s counsel in 3 October 2002.

medical assistance (see   Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v.

    Some of the applicants also made submissions concerning factual and legal matters unrelated to the above non-enforcement issues. II.     RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW 11.

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

By letters of different dates (see the Appendix) the Government informed the Court that they proposed to make unilateral declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by the applications.

The Montenegrin Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Valentina Pavličić. 3.

In their submissions made in 2021-23 the applicants alleged, however, that there was no longer a realistic prospect of success for benefiting from that judgment.

    The Court notes at the outset the Government’s submission that the applicant’s request to have A.İ.Ö. and H.A. heard as witnesses had not been made with a view to examining them, but rather

    The respondent Governments did not make any specific comments. 56.

Accordingly, there is no call to make an award under this head.