On 16 October 2014 the applicant submitted a written statement to the Court of Appeal, alleging several errors in the decision of 18 September 2014.

Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase }     Communicated on 29 January 2015   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 29007/08 Primož BRITOVŠEK against Slovenia lodged on 12 June 2008 STATEMENT

JUDGE O: But you are ... if you want to tell him what passed between you and the solicitor, you are quite entitled to do so but if you start the ball rolling in that way, you can be asked questions, do

The applicant complies and one of the men starts tying his hands with his belt.

    The Court reiterates that in cases of the type being examined here, what is in issue is not an act by the State but the alleged inadequacy of the protection afforded by the domestic courts

It was considered that the burden of supporting lone parents fell largely upon the State.

Second applicant :   What do you think about that?

    According to Article 89 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, when time limits are calculated, the day from which they start running are not taken into account.

Government of the United States of America   ([2020] EWHC   508) (for details of that domestic decision, see Sanchez-Sanchez , cited above, §§ 19-23) and Hafeez v United States   ([2020]

C2 supplied the drugs, while K, [the applicant] and H carried out the actual work.”

In January 1992 the Secretary of State rejected his claim.

must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what

While the authorities had initially acted without undue delay, the case was transferred to a public prosecutor after the applicant’s partner repeatedly failed to appear at court.

the number of defendants involved, the special judicial status of the defendants, including the applicant, the applicant’s conduct and that of the authorities, including the diligence they displayed while

It therefore decided that the three months’ detention pending trial should start from that date. The court did not refer to any new reasons for extending the applicant’s detention pending trial.

While examining similar complaints lodged against the Russian Federation, the Court has consistently held that applicants are required to make use of the newly introduced compensatory remedy in respect

THE LAW The six months rule, while technical in nature, serves an important role in the Convention system establishing the temporal limit after which the European supervision of a complaint is no longer

According to the Court’s case-law, the six-month period cannot start running until the applicant and/or his or her representative have effective and sufficient knowledge of the final domestic decision

possession of supporting documents from the applicant about his poor financial situation, the Court of First Instance had failed to make an assessment of his personal circumstances in accordance with what