Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see Shishkov   v. Bulgaria , no.

;   Nikolay Fedorovich Menyaylo 12/08/1951 Mayskiy   10/03/2011 (22/03/2011) 12/10/2012     Unenforced     Violation of Article 6 of the Convention Vladimir Abramovich Shpakov

  2298 ‑ 99, §§ 144 ‑ 50, Nikolova , cited above, §§ 49 ‑ 53, and Shishkov v.   Bulgaria , no. 38822/97, §§ 52 ‑ 54, 9 January 2003). 107.

Bulgaria , cited above, §§ 67-87 and Shishkov v. Bulgaria , no. 38822/97, §§ 57-67, ECHR 2003 ‑ I).

Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see Shishkov v. Bulgaria , no.   38822/97, § 66, ECHR 2003-I). 89.

Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see Shishkov v. Bulgaria , no.   38822/97, §   66, ECHR 2003-I).

Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see Shishkov v. Bulgaria , no.

Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see, for example, Shishkov v.

passive smoking, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of or insufficient electric light, inadequate temperature       30126/19* 24/05/2019 Aleksandr Nikolayevich SHIROKOV

Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see Shishkov   v. Bulgaria , no.

  32541/08 and 43441/08, § 79, ECHR 2014 (extracts); Shlykov and Others v. Russia , nos. 78638/11 and 3 others, § 51, 19 January 2021; and Petrella v.

passive smoking, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack or insufficient quantity of food   1,000   7343/19 22/01/2019 Roman Vyacheslavovich SHIROKOV

Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see Shishkov v.   Bulgaria , no.

  3298 ‑ 99, §§ 144 ‑ 50, Nikolova , cited above, §§ 49 ‑ 53 and Shishkov v.   Bulgaria , no. 38822/97, §§ 52 ‑ 54, 9 January 2003). 64.

  26899/95, § 55, 5 April 2001; Shishkov v. Bulgaria , no. 38822/97, § 53, ECHR 2003-I; and Rahbar-Pagard v. Bulgaria , nos. 45466/99 and 29903/02, § 49, 6 April 2006).

Court’s case ‑ law, Article 5 § 4 enshrines, as does Article 6 § 1, a right of access to a court, which can only be subject to reasonable limitations that do not impair its very essence (see Shishkov

Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see Shishkov v.

Although the reasonableness of the length of the detention cannot be defined in abstracto , and whereas even short periods of detention are susceptible to review by the Court (see Shishkov v.

Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see Shishkov v.