ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   3 OF THE CONVENTION 6.     The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention.

Slovakia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Péter Paczolay, President,   Alena Poláčková,   Gilberto Felici, judges, and Viktoriya

The applicant had one hot shower per week and one hour of outdoor exercise per day. 13.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5   §   3 OF THE CONVENTION 6.     The applicants complained principally that their pre-trial detention had been unreasonably long.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 6.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5   §   3 OF THE CONVENTION 6.     In application no.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 6.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 6.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 6.

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 5.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 6.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 6.

ill-treatment of the second applicant, and under Article 5 of the Convention concerning the alleged unlawful detention of the second applicant and Mr Rashid Ismailov, as well as the applicants’ complaint

He noted at the outset the considerable amount of time that had lapsed since the alleged incident.

His lawyer informed the Court that Mr Zsolnay’s wife and children, his successors (Ms   Györgyné Zsolnay, Mr Péter Zsolnay and Ms Klára Edit Simányiné Zsolnay), wished to pursue the application. 3

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 8 of the Convention 7 .

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   3 OF THE CONVENTION 7.     The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport.

THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT Alleged violation of Article 8 of the Convention 6.

  The Government submitted their observations, having disputed the violations alleged.