Article 2 : Les conclusions présentées par la commune de Milhaud au titre de l'article L.761-1 du code de justice administrative sont rejetées.

On 1 July 2009 the Military Court of the Vladivostok Garrison convicted the applicant of fraud committed in abuse of office and sentenced him to four years’ imprisonment with deprivation of military rank

    On 30 May 2001 the second applicant wrote to the military prosecutor of military unit no. 20102 and to the military prosecutor of the North Caucasus Military Circuit.

On 9 November 2010 the chief public prosecutor submitted his observations to the Supreme Military Administrative Court.

The applicant’s son (Z.B.) was called up for military service in July 2009. He had been serving as a sniper in Gadabay region in military unit no.   171 since October 2009.

The applicant complains under Article 2 of the Convention that the State failed to protect the life of his son during military service.

(b)   Whether the investigation was independent – The investigation had been carried out by the military prosecutor, assisted by detectives from the national gendarmerie.

service would pose a serious danger to military order.

58 of the Military Penal Code, on a charge of inciting conscripts to evade military service. 14.

On 28 November 2014 he arrived at the military base in order to continue his military service in Armenia.

A cause d'une négligence de      l'actuel procureur du Roi de Bruxelles, D., une fraude évaluée      à 1,5 - 2 milliards reste impunie.

Section 25 Conversion of advances on military pensions [of the authorities’ own motion] “Advances on military pensions and other benefits under the Ordinance on the payment of advances on military pensions

    On 27 May 2003 the military prosecutor of military unit no.

court’s judgment of 6 October 2008, upheld by 3d circuit military court on 14 January 2009 (non-payment of military allowances)   26 th garrison military court’s judgment of 20 January 2009, upheld

que la reprise de ses stocks lui avait été proposée, et qu'aucun justificatif comptable ou financier n'avait été produit par la société Brenntag qui réalise un chiffre d'affaires annuel supérieur au milliard

II, le découvert garanti ayant été porté à 1,812 milliard de francs pour trois frégates, d'autre part, bénéficié, au sens de l'article 321-1 du même code, des produits de ces délits. 10.

Italie (satisfaction équitable) [GC] - 14025/88 Arrêt 16.6.1999 [GC] Article 41 Satisfaction équitable La Cour dit que le gouvernement italien doit verser la somme d’un milliard de lires à Aldo, Angela

A decision of the Supreme Military Council is required to discharge an officer whose case has been submitted by the Chief of Staff to the Supreme Military Council.”

  Law no. 357 (“the Military Legal Service Act”) Section 22 (c) of the Military Legal Service Act provides: “Irrespective of length of service, servicemen whose continued presence in the armed forces