Fribergh , Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application introduced with the European Commission of Human Rights on 11 March 1998 and registered on 31   March 1998, Having regard to Article

2025   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 15476/24 John k/a Ganni ATTARD against Malta lodged on 31 May 2024 communicated on 4 March 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns civil appeal

On 19 March 2021 the Supreme Court refused to entertain the applicant’s cassation appeal. The applicant has been detained at the Gostynin Centre since 17 April 2017.

On 4 March 1991, they served notice on the tenants informing them that the order for possession would be enforced by a bailiff on 14 March 1991.

Between 14 March 1990 and 11 October 1996, the bailiff made 18   attempts to recover possession, on 14 March 1990, 27 April 1990, 9 July 1990, 2 October 1990, 11 December 1990, 11 February 1991, 7

In 1999 the municipality of Baia Mare authorised the company to carry on its activity subject to obtaining an environmental compliance certificate.

However, those events cannot on their own lead to a finding of a breach of Article 3 by the State.

On 1 March 2005 the Plovdiv District Court convicted the applicant of theft and sentenced him to four years’ imprisonment.

1994, the Government’s supplementary observations on 16 March 1994, and the applicants’ and the Government’s comments on the claims for just satisfaction on 10 and 18 March respectively.

(c)     In a report of 6 March 1996, the forensic doctor confirmed the findings in the reports of 19 and 27 February 1996. 5.     Sinan Kaya 28.

    On 14   March 2002 the bailiffs initiated the enforcement proceedings. On 28   March 2002 the amount ordered by the judgment was transferred to the applicant’s account. 6.

  The Prosecutor considered that in the light of these findings, the applicant's statements as to ill-treatment were not credible.

By letters of 8 and 15 March 2007, the respondent Government informed the Court that, according to the findings of an inquiry carried out in Iran, the judgment of 20 July 2002 was not an authentic document

Their findings in that regard had been neither arbitrary nor manifestly unreasonable, but based on a thorough, comprehensive analysis of the evidence gathered.

On 4 March 1997 the newspaper’s editor was charged with having abetted the applicant to commit libel. The applicant was again allowed to consult the case file on 10 March 1997.

and 30   April 2009 (“the 16 March report” and “the 30 April report”); from findings made by the domestic court in the course of the proceedings described below; from the Government’s observations

    On 31 March 2014 the Nizhniy Novgorod childcare authorities also issued their opinion on the case, finding that it was in the second applicant’s best interest to live with his mother.

2002, 4 July 2002, 5   September 2002, 14   November 2002, 9 January 2003, 6 March 2003, 17   April 2003 and 28 August 2003.

On 22 March 2011 the Gdańsk Court of Appeal gave a decision extending the applicant’s detention.