#Cerere de decizie preliminară formulată de House of Lords – Regatul Unit.

#American Express Co. κατά The Lords Commissioners of Her Majesty’s Treasury.

. # Begäran om förhandsavgörande: House of Lords - Förenade kungariket. # Tillnärmning av lagstiftning - Växtskydd - Direktiv 77/93/EEG - Införsel till gemenskapen av växter med ursprung i ett icke-medlemsland

#Αίτηση για την έκδοση προδικαστικής αποφάσεως: House of Lords - Ηνωμένο Βασίλειο.

. # Demande de décision préjudicielle: House of Lords - Royaume-Uni. # Affaire C-169/91. # Interprétation des articles 30 et 36 du traité CEE - Interdiction d'exercer des activités commerciales le dimanche

  On 8 March 2006 the House of Lords unanimously dismissed the applicants’ appeals.

On 17 October 2008 the Lori Regional Court decided to detain the applicant.

On 17 January 2002, the House of Lords granted leave to appeal.

F a déclaré le siège social d'une activité de restauration rapide au domicile de Mme C à Lorris.

Dans un arrêt de la Chambre des lords du 30 janvier 2003, Lord Bingham fit sienne l'opinion que Lord Hutton avait exprimée dans la cause du requérant (voir ci-dessus).

public importance which ought to be considered by the House of Lords.

  The House of Lords 15.     The House of Lords, on 8 March 2006, unanimously dismissed the applicants' appeals ([2006] UKHL 12).

As to the nature and extent of the coverage, Lord Wheatley noted: “5. ...

(iii)     “out of time” Lord Neuberger, with whom Lords Mance and Hughes agreed, rejected the applicants’ assertion that there had been events occurring after 1970 which would have permitted

La Chambre des communes approuva à une large majorité les dispositions égalisant l’âge du consentement, mais la Chambre des lords les repoussa.

Lord Justice Pill agreed with Lord Bingham’s statement in the High Court proceedings that: “Had the point on section   26 been raised at the hearing [before Dover Magistrates’ Court], it seems clear

In Hayter’s appeal against conviction, a majority of the House of Lords (Lord Bingham, Lord Steyn and Lord Brown) found that the trial judge had directed the jury not to take into account Ryan’s confession

On 13 January 1998 the House of Lords refused the applicants leave to appeal.

COUR D'APPEL DE PAPEETE Chambre des Terres --- RG : N° RG 24/00006 APPELANTS Madame [K] [U] Monsieur [O] [X] Monsieur [L] [G] Madame [N] [Y] Madame [P] [I] [U] assistés de Me Loris