The applicant had previously experienced some psychological instability in his life, but, following the accident, he began to manifest symptoms of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.

Court HR, Miailhe v. France judgment of 26 September 1996, Reports 1996-IV, No. 16, p. 1338, para. 43).

    La Cour n’aperçoit pas de lien de causalité entre la violation constatée et le dommage matériel allégué, à supposer qu’il y en a un, et rejette cette demande.

Mihail Cîrstoiu («   le requérant   »), a saisi la Cour le 9 juin 2005, en vertu de l’article 34 de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des Libertés fondamentales («   la

    Le 11 avril 2008, la direction de la sûreté informa le procureur de la République qu’aucun élément infractionnel en lien avec les faits reprochés à l’association requérante n’avait été découvert

Popov and Chonin (cited above), where it found a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 with regard to the excessive length of the same restitution proceedings, it considered that there was no causal link

    The Court does not discern any causal link between the violation found and the pecuniary damage alleged; it therefore rejects this claim.

Ekimdzhiev, a Bulgarian national who was born in 1964 and lives in Plovdiv (“the second applicant”). 2.

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, ... and his correspondence. 2.

, and his statements,   Art. 2 (1) - unlawful killings, disappearances, or life-threatening injuries sustained as a result of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine - the applicants claimed that

    On 23 April 1999, just after 2.00 am approximately, one of the RTS buildings at Takovska Street was hit by a missile launched from a NATO forces’ aircraft.

These suspicions affected their business activities and personal life negatively.

indifférenciées et avaient porté sur plusieurs milliers de documents informatiques, ainsi que sur la messagerie électronique de plusieurs personnes, et que de nombreux documents saisis étaient sans lien

violation de la compétence exclusive de la Cour de justice de la République lorsqu'elle constatait que l'information conduite par les magistrats instructeurs parisiens portait sur des infractions en lien

It is easy and clear at the same time and the cassation chamber of the Supreme Court (like [Mr]   Slobodník) has not grasped it...

However, for the purposes of Article 8 of the Convention, a minority’s way of life is, in principle, entitled to the protection guaranteed for an individual’s private life, family life and home (see, among

An appeal against a decision taken by a Provincial Administrative Council lies with the Council of State ( Danıştay ).

originated in an application (no. 10126/82) against Austria lodged with the Commission under Article 25 (art. 25) by an association called Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" ("Doctors for the right to life

apart from Veysi Eli Mikail, who is an Iraqi citizen.