CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-67791
9 décembre 2004
as well as to the discriminatory violation of their rights of freedom of expression and freedom of association; Whereas in its judgment of 17 July 2001 the Court unanimously: - held
Page 20 sur 1190
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-553811-555759
21 mai 2002
sum of EUR 195,000 for pecuniary damage and EUR 19,500 for non-pecuniary damage.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1972337-2088855
12 avril 2007
The Court held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and § 3 (d).
ECLI:CEDH:003-1872726-1974823
19 décembre 2006
It therefore held unanimously that there has been a breach of Article 34.
ECLI:CEDH:003-1995439-2103500
26 avril 2007
It therefore held that there had been a violation of Article 3 on that account.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1122DEC000295911
22 novembre 2011
After the operation, the doctors performed a brain scan on Mr Garcea, only to discover that some pieces of metal had been left inside his head.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0516JUD003474916
16 mai 2024
camp’ held in Bure...
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0310JUD001409712
10 mars 2015
On 27 October 2014 the Constitutional Court held, in decision no. 32/2014.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0719JUD005244209
19 juillet 2011
It was established that the second applicant had suffered contusions of the chest, head and pelvis ( contusio thoracis, capitis et pelveos ), while the third applicant had suffered contusions on the head
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-235431
9 juillet 2024
The prison Director assigned the applicant, initially as Head of the Intervention Unit (between 8 May and 31 October 2017) and subsequently, as Head of the Security Office (between 31 April 2018 and 7
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6701
28 mars 2000
In December 1997 a full court of the Audit Court had held that law to be unconstitutional but the applicant had still not received the sum awarded by the 2nd Division.
ECLI:CEDH:003-491236-492499
7 février 2002
The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and awarded the applicant EUR 4,500 for non-pecuniary damage and EUR 3,500 for costs and expenses.
ECLI:CEDH:003-2622513-2858537
3 février 2009
The Court therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1014JUD007644601
14 octobre 2003
In 1995 six hearings were held. The trial court ordered preparation of an expert opinion and held a view of the property. 11.
ECLI:CEDH:001-180529
19 décembre 2017
The applicant did not specify exact periods during which he was held in each of the above cells and the number of detainees held with him in each cell.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0511JUD007373117
11 mai 2021
It further held that the applicant’s acts of violence were the result of the inadequate state of his mental health.
ECLI:CEDH:003-1881563-1986072
9 janvier 2007
In the case of Arnolin and Others , the Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and awarded the applicants, for all the applications put together, the total sum of
ECLI:CEDH:002-14420
7 janvier 2025
Subsequently the second applicant company sub-contracted several other companies to help it obtain the requisite quantity of tests, eventually purchasing the tests for EUR 1,135,360.
ECLI:CEDH:003-1998421-2106870
10 mai 2007
The applicant, who was Head of the Architecture and Planning Department of Chişinău Municipal Council, suffers, among other things, from osteoporosis.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0415JUD004087707
15 avril 2014
In sum, the experts held that the plaintiff’s book was a popular health book, that it was not a word-for-word translation or citation from Dr Spock’s book, that in the first edition of his book the plaintiff