CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1203JUD002579507
3 décembre 2019
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)
Page 20 sur 1853
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1216JUD002347615
16 décembre 2021
In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by [a] ... tribunal ... ... 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0617JUD000960118
17 juin 2025
The applicant was heard in person by the İzmir Tenth Assize Court (“the trial court”) during the hearing of 21 July 2008.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0925JUD003648416
25 septembre 2025
The Court reiterates that the right to a fair hearing under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, interpreted in the light of the principles of the rule of law and legal certainty
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0623JUD004656410
23 juin 2015
On 24 January 2008 the applicant requested that a hearing scheduled before the District Court for 28 January 2008 be postponed sine die .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0326JUD000777917
26 mars 2020
relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which reads as follows: Article 6 § 1 “In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0926JUD003416715
26 septembre 2023
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1113JUD002079707
13 novembre 2018
In the meantime, but before the hearing of 7 June 2006, the applicant’s representative requested that he be excused from that hearing since he had another scheduled court hearing elsewhere
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0710JUD006621512
10 juillet 2018
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0418JUD000368116
18 avril 2023
As to the Government’s argument that the applicant failed in his administrative action to propose obtaining a further expert report, or hearing the administrative authorities’ experts, the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1020JUD003187615
20 octobre 2022
Accordingly, this complaint concerns the fair hearing guarantee, requiring the courts to give sufficient reasons for their decisions (see, for example, García Ruiz v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0415JUD001820220
15 avril 2021
The applicant complained that his right to a fair hearing had been breached on account of the domestic court’s failure to properly and timely notify him of hearings in the civil proceedings
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0315JUD005164308
15 mars 2016
examined in the domestic proceedings, in violation of Article 6 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0911JUD000721015
11 septembre 2025
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0416JUD002345604
16 avril 2013
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0326JUD000682210
At the hearing of 21 August 2008, after the examination of police officer G.H., the applicant requested the court to admit as evidence and examine a video recording made by a news agency
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1107JUD008010413
7 novembre 2017
The relevant Article reads as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by [a] ... tribunal ...” 31.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0326JUD002834708
26 mars 2019
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1127JUD002069606
27 novembre 2014
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0925JUD006578309
25 septembre 2018
The hearing was public.