Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.   3.

    On 31   January 2007 the District Court found the applicant guilty of manslaughter and sentenced him to six years’ imprisonment.

On 17   August 2001 the Klaipėda Regional Court found him guilty of aggravated murder and illegal possession of firearms.

A.B.’s guilty verdict was confirmed on appeal on 24 April 2010, but his sentence reduced to six months’ imprisonment. 7.

According to the applicant, the testimony of one of the other defendants, A.T., was the only source of evidence showing the applicant’s guilt.

After deliberating, the jury found the applicant not guilty of wilful homicide but guilty of being an accomplice to the crime of causing grievous bodily harm resulting in death.

More specifically, the finding of the applicant’s guilt was based on the following three episodes, the occurrence of which had been confirmed by the statements of numerous pertinent witnesses, examined

On 2 December 2002 the same district court found the applicant guilty of the charges under Article 319 of the Criminal Code.

In 2005 a criminal court found the journalist guilty of denigrating “Turkishness” (Turkish identity) and imposed a suspended prison sentence on him.

He had to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law. 17.

guilt has been established by a court ( Konstas v.

He also alleges that he was presumed guilty throughout the hearing contrary to Article 6 para. 2.

V.O. denied his guilt and claimed that he and A.K. had been defending themselves against an attack by V.M.

The district court was empowered either to uphold the applicant’s acquittal or to find him guilty after carrying out a thorough review of the issue of his guilt or innocence allowing, if appropriate, the

And if ever you were to convince us that you are not guilty we will say that you are not guilty; if you will not convince us we will say you are guilty."

  On 10 December 1997 the applicant requested the Judge for Preliminary Investigations to revoke the decision to detain him on remand , arguing that there was no serious indication of guilt.

  The result of the test was consistent with the applicant being the biological father of V, and he eventually pleaded guilty to the allegation of incest.

    The Court considers that the presumption of innocence has been flouted if an official statement concerning an accused person reflects an opinion that he is guilty even though his guilt has

    During his questioning at the investigation stage, the applicant admitted his guilt in Bo.’s death but stated that it had been an accident and not an intentional murder.