The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points

    La Cour juge approprié de calquer le taux des intérêts moratoires sur le taux d’intérêt de la facilité de prêt marginal de la Banque centrale européenne majoré de trois points de pourcentage

However, in determining compensation for the purposes of just satisfaction the Court is certainly not bound to follow domestic law (compare Edwards v.

of incitement was determined in each case in order to ensure that the rights of the defence were adequately protected, in particular the right to adversarial proceedings and to equality of arms (see Edwards

rappeler que, dans des circonstances comme celles de l’espèce, une prompte réaction des autorités est capitale pour maintenir la confiance du public et son adhésion à l’État de droit ( Paul et Audrey Edwards

Republic of Malta lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 26 November 2020 by two Maltese nationals, Ms Maria

[These] are owned by her separately under their marriage agreement dating from 1967.

Italy 18/12/2009 Household Maria Antonietta IMPERIO Born in 1933 Deceased in 2013 Francesco DE MATTIA 1959 (also as heir) Antonio DE MATTIA 1961 (also as heir) Alfonso Maria DE MATTIA 1965 (also as heir

Edwards and Lewis v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos.   39647/98 and 40461/98, §   46, ECHR 2004 ‑ X). 32.

Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   María Elósegui , President ,   Mattias Guyomar,   Kateřina Šimáčková , judges , and Viktoriya

Although she withdrew her criminal complaint and the applicant was never convicted, it was uncontested that he had left the marital home in Spain together with his young daughter without his wife’s consent

no. 27229/95, ECHR 2001 III; McKerr v. the United Kingdom , no. 28883/95, ECHR 2001 ‑ III; Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom , no. 24746/94, ECHR 2001 ‑ III (extracts); Paul and Audrey Edwards

the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal

the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal

has been an acknowledgment of the violation by the domestic courts, albeit it was likely not to have covered the period prior to 1987 given the relevant domestic law and practice (see, for example, Edwards

principle, be capable of leading to the establishment of the facts of the case and, if the allegations prove to be true, to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Paul and Audrey Edwards

principle, be capable of leading to the establishment of the facts of the case and, if the allegations prove to be true, to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Paul and Audrey Edwards

  5212/13) against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Ukrainian national, Mr Eduard

application against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two Ukrainian nationals, Mr Eduard