She complained about the length of the proceedings, which lasted nearly 12 years.

She submitted, in particular, that on 28 October 2005 she had visited the first applicant in the remand prison and he had told her that he had been ill-treated at the UBOP and at SIZO no. 1.

    The applicants’ representative stated that she had lost contact with the applicants over the years and she had not known that some of them were deceased.

She received what she described as a “terrible blow in the right leg beneath the tibia”. She realised she had been hit with a sharp object, namely a bayonet wielded by a Turkish soldier.

Relying on Article   6   §   1 (right of access to court), she complains that, in a civil claim she brought against a housing co-operative, she was only granted legal aid four days before

    On 26 August 1993 the District Court requested the first applicant to   state whether she wished to continue the action.

Shvayko informed the Court that she wished to pursue the application. I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 7.

    The applicant, Mr Alexandru Verlan, is a Moldovan national, who was born in 1978 and lives in Pîrîta. He was represented before the Court by Mr   M. Postu and Mr A.

She alleged that her aunt’s signature had been forged on that will. 12.

Given that she had suffered an injury to her tail bone, the only position that she had been able to cope with was staying upright all the time.

In these letters the applicant alleged in particular that she had a “special relationship” with the mayor of Magadan, that she was destined to protect people in high office, and that she was being persecuted

The applicant admitted that she had taken the money because she had thought of it as a gift from a grateful patient. She maintained that the police had incited her to accept the money.

While carrying out her parental duties she harms [the child], she has abused her parental authority since November 2007 at least ...

She said that she had asked her brother to “touch [her] bottom” and that he had “put his finger in [her] bottom”.

She received no reply. 8.

:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } FIFTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 33572/02 by Alexandra

She argued that, in view of her condition at that juncture and the short period of available time, she had not lodged a request to the Fund before leaving as she had considered that she could have done

She noted that the rental income in 1998 was calculated at EUR   19,224 per annum and EUR 40,050 in 2017, while she had only been awarded EUR   10,000.

According to the written statement of the applicant's mother, since 1963 she and A.A. had been in a common-law marriage, as a result of which the applicant was born in 1964.