(article 108 § 2 du code pénal) ayant entraîné la mort de la victime. Il fut acquitté du chef de vol (article 144 § 2 du code pénal).

In doing so, it relied on Article 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

In addition to the grounds previously relied on, it considered that the applicant’s detention was justified under Article 258 §   2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure since that provision established

Such lengthy prolongation of his detention would change it into an actual sentence and was contrary to the aim of Article 258 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

    In its decision of 29 January 2004 dismissing the applicant's appeal against the decision of 17 December 2003 prolonging his detention, the Court of Appeal held that Article 258 § 2 of the

    In its decision of 18 January 2005 dismissing the applicant's appeal against the decision of 15 December 2004 prolonging his detention, the Court of Appeal held that Article 258 § 2 of the

Furthermore, considering the severity of the anticipated penalty, his detention was justified under Article 258 § 2 of the 1997 Code.

In addition to the grounds previously relied on, it held that the applicant's detention was justified under Article 258 §   2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure since that provision established a presumption

The time period may be extended for valid reasons (Article 256).

The time period may be extended for valid reasons (Article 256).

The time period may be extended for valid reasons (Article 256).

It also had regard to the severity of the anticipated penalty and the presumption established by Article 258 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

  258   § 2 of the Criminal Code (see paragraph 49 below). 24 .

258 § 2 of the CCP).

    Pursuant to Article 258 § 2 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, after having stayed the proceedings, an investigator must take measures personally or through the police to discover the

QUE LE MOYEN NE SAURAIT ETRE ACCUEILLI ; SUR LE DEUXIEME MOYEN DE CASSATION, PRIS DE LA VIOLATION DE L'ARTICLE 255 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE, 289, 290, 405 ET 593 DU MEME CODE ; EN CE QU'IL RESULTE

respectives des parties que ces modalités sont l'objet d'un litige ; qu'en ne statuant pas sur les demandes relatives à l'enfant, après le rejet de la demande en divorce, la cour d'appel a violé les articles

L.258 ; 2°- dans les conditions prévues aux articles L.122-5 et L.122-7 du code des communes, s'il est nécessaire de compléter le conseil avant l'élection d'un nouveau maire" ; Considérant que si, comme

LA COUR, VU LES MEMOIRES DEPOSES; SUR LE PREMIER MOYEN DE CASSATION PRIS DE LA VIOLATION DES ARTICLES 258, 262 ET 267 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE, ENSEMBLE VIOLATION DES ARTICLES 593 DU MEME CODE ET