CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0108JUD004452104
8 janvier 2008
The courts’ decisions were based on Article 258 § 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which lists grounds for pre-trial detention, such as, the risk that an accused will abscond or go into
Page 2 sur 4904
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0301JUD002908295
1 mars 2001
de l'article 6 §§ 3 a) et b) de la Convention, combiné avec l'article 6 § 1. 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0625JUD004415112
25 juin 2020
Under Article 258 § 1 (b), an appellate court quashes a judgment which has been appealed against if the factual findings in that judgment are unclear or incomplete, or if the first-instance
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0213JUD000529716
13 février 2025
14203515 under Article 258 § 1 of the Criminal Code (see paragraph 44 below).
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-81464
6 juin 2007
According to Article 257§1, detention on remand shall not be imposed if another preventive measure is sufficient.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0108JUD000464602
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 33.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0112DEC006912201
12 janvier 2010
As soon as possible after the arrest of the suspect, the measures necessary for the collection of essential information shall be taken; and, in the event that the grounds referred to in Article 258 § 1
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0404JUD005747700
4 avril 2006
Article 259, in its relevant part, reads: “1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0318JUD001103603
18 mars 2008
Il s'appuyait notamment sur les articles 258 § 1 ‑ 1) et 259 § 4 du code de procédure pénale (« le CPP »).
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0322JUD003720197
22 mars 2001
Il invoquait également les articles 1 et 2 § 2 de la Convention. 4.
According to Article 258 § 1 (a), where the proper establishment of the facts of the case can be achieved on the basis of the case file, the second-instance court completes or rectifies the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0628DEC001342502
28 juin 2005
The grounds for his detention listed in Article 258 §§ 1 and 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and given in previous decisions continued to exist.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0108JUD005602710
8 janvier 2013
The time period may be extended for valid reasons (Article 256).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0205JUD004182810
5 février 2013
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113JUD002467710
13 novembre 2012
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1107JUD002943105
7 novembre 2017
if he considered that the act or decision had violated his rights and freedoms (Article 254 of the CCP and section 1 of the Judicial Review Act).
cr
6079a7e09ba5988459c4b403
6 juillet 1982
AGGRAVANTE COMME LE SOUTIENT A TORT LE MOYEN QUI NE PEUT ETRE ACCUEILLI ; SUR LE SECOND MOYEN DE CASSATION, PRIS DE LA VIOLATION DES ARTICLES 258, 258-1 ET 288 ALINEA 3, 591 ET 593 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1128JUD000599308
28 novembre 2013
2). 25. If the court finds the complaint justified, it issues a decision requiring the authority or official to fully remedy the breach of the citizen’s rights (Article 258 § 1).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1127JUD004146110
27 novembre 2012
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0511JUD004783419
11 mai 2023
Article 16 “§ 1.