AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0314DEC000595203
14 mars 2006
14 mars 2006
inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION PARTIAL DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 5952/03 by Stefan
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0122DEC003386602
22 janvier 2004
22 janvier 2004
Steiner , Mr K. Hajiyev, judges , and Mr S.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0222JUD000526603
22 février 2007
22 février 2007
Steiner , Mr K. Hajiyev , Mr D. Spielmann, judges , and Mr S.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1012DEC002290293
12 octobre 1994
12 octobre 1994
Consequently, the application cannot be rejected as having been introduced out of time.
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-92192
19 mars 2009
19 mars 2009
from Scotland, Wales and England; serving police officers seconded from police forces across the United Kingdom and a number of retired Royal Ulster Constabulary; Noting that the HET funding cannot
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-185217
5 juillet 2018
5 juillet 2018
The Department responded to some of them that they needed to present documents which the applicants claim they cannot obtain.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0710DEC000595203
10 juillet 2007
10 juillet 2007
However, the mere fact that a judge has already taken pre-trial decisions cannot by itself be regarded as justifying concerns about his impartiality.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0111DEC002261493
11 janvier 1995
11 janvier 1995
Application No. 22614/93 by Steven
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0122DEC004139411
22 janvier 2013
22 janvier 2013
The applicant cannot claim special circumstances which require his complaint to be examined by this Court rather than the national courts.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0706DEC002738395
6 juillet 1995
6 juillet 1995
On 30 August 1994 the National Immigration Board (Statens invandrarverk) rejected the application and ordered the applicants' deportation to Croatia.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0422JUD003007204
22 avril 2008
22 avril 2008
In the case of Stefan Kozłowski v.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0413DEC001258586
13 avril 1989
13 avril 1989
Consequently, this complaint cannot be rejected for failure to exhaust domestic remedies.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0207JUD003020606
7 février 2019
7 février 2019
After Mr Stefan Arsovski’s death in 2007, his widow, Mrs Dragica Arsova, and his daughters, Mrs Karolina Joseva and Mrs Kalinka Stefanovska, applied to continue the application in his name.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0108DEC004375910
8 janvier 2013
8 janvier 2013
Mr Steven Willcox (“the first applicant”) is a British national who was born in 1964 and is currently detained at HM Prison Rye Hill.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0928DEC003753897
28 septembre 1999
28 septembre 1999
The municipal area plan can include a provision according to which planning permission cannot be granted except with the approval of the Provincial Executive (sections 15 (2), 16).
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0629DEC004121798
29 juin 1999
29 juin 1999
By a decision of 15 June 1989 the National Immigration Board ( Statens invandrarverk ) granted the applicant a permanent residence permit in Sweden.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-206171
22 octobre 2020
22 octobre 2020
A decision delivered on an appeal in the interests of the law cannot alter the outcome of cases already decided. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0901DEC001559189
1 septembre 1993
1 septembre 1993
xa0; Application No. 15591/89 by Karl and Stefanie
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0911DEC003552609
11 septembre 2012
11 septembre 2012
That, in itself, cannot be considered contrary to the Convention.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0601DEC002014706
1 juin 2010
1 juin 2010
avoid } .s3EEACD50 { width:194.93pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } FIFTH SECTION PARTIAL DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 20147/06 by Stefan
Source officiellePage 2 sur 22