The applicant is the owner of a commercial building in Split.

Subsequently, she instituted civil proceedings before the Split Municipal Court ( Općinski sud u Splitu ) seeking compensation from the State.

Y... et son assureur, l'UAP, devenue Axa assurances, et la société SPIT, fournisseur des systèmes de fixation des tuyauteries ; que, sur nouvelle assignation en référé-provision, M.

    Civil proceedings instituted by the applicant On 3 August 1999 the applicant brought a civil action in the Split Municipal Court ( Općinski sud u Splitu ) against two individuals, M.P. and

  Mišurac, a lawyer practising in Split. The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs Š. Stažnik.

    On 23 May 2005 the applicant company brought a civil action in the Split Municipal Court ( Općinski sud u Splitu ) against Mr S.L. seeking payment of a certain sum of money on the basis of

  Franceschi, a lawyer practising in Split. A.

, les requérants ont fait assigner Monsieur [J] [Q] devant le juge des référés du tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-à-Pitre, aux fins de : - Dire et juger que les installations de climatisation de type split

On 12 May 2008 at 3 p.m. the applicant was brought before the investigating judge of the Split County Court ( Županijski sud u Splitu ). His counsel was present.

    On 23 February 1999 the applicant brought a civil action for defamation against the Croatian Radio Television in the Split Municipal Court ( Općinski sud u Splitu ), seeking non-pecuniary

In 1983 and 1985 the applicant’s predecessor’s house and a plot of land in Split were expropriated but the compensation was not awarded.

La SAS SPIT fait valoir que si les critères légaux ont été pris en compte, le critère des qualités professionnelles a désigné M.

    Minor Offences proceedings The police lodged a complaint against B.L. with the Split Minor Offences Court ( Prekršajni sud u Splitu ) and proceedings were instituted against B.L. before that

    Meanwhile, on 15 April 1969 the applicants’ relatives brought a civil action in the Split Municipal Court ( Općinski sud u Splitu ), seeking compensation from the tennis club for unauthorised

FAITS et PROCEDURE Mme [H] [V], née en 1960, a été engagée à compter du 1er octobre 1981 par la SARL Marteau, devenue la SARL Spitz aux termes de plusieurs cessions.

On 30 June 2005 the Split Welfare Centre ( Centar za socijalnu skrb Split ; “the Split Centre”) issued a decision awarding the applicant custody of K.S. and allowing M.S. bimonthly visits.

On 4 October 2002 the Split County Court ( Županijski sud u Splitu ) quashed the first-instance judgment and remitted the case.

On 20 May 2011 an investigating judge ( sudac istrage ) of the Split County Court ( Županijski sud u Splitu ) ordered the applicant’s pre-trial detention ( istražni zatvor ) for one month under Article

Following two remittals, on 26 November 1997 the Split Municipal Court ( Općinski sud u Splitu ) gave a partial judgment ordering the applicant’s reinstatement and awarding him compensation of salary.