CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

87 résultats pour « Samir BELLASRI »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1013DEC001795911

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 2020

13 octobre 2020

In the same letter the applicant companies were informed that they would continue their legal relationship with the new owner in accordance with the relevant national legislation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14110

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2023

16 mai 2023

When using either scheme, the requests for the issuance of assignment orders aimed at enforcing the same decisions and judgments had been filed at the same time.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-222487

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2022

12 décembre 2022

As a result, in line with the same law, the applicants were temporarily suspended from their functions without pay.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1002DEC006454012

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2018

2 octobre 2018

The same applies if new, important developments have occurred during the proceedings before the Court and where, despite being expressly required to do so by Rule 47 §   7 (former Rule 47 § 6) of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0623DEC005769913

Admin. suprême

23 juin 2020

23 juin 2020

At the same time, however, the applicant’s lawyer acknowledged that it was nevertheless questionable whether the applicant had properly remembered the exact dates on which many of the offences had been

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-147096

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 2014

15 septembre 2014

Bekauri and Ms Ts. Javakhishvili, lawyers practising in Tbilisi. 2.     The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1002DEC006462312

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2018

2 octobre 2018

person or through their legal representatives, are under the continuous obligation to keep the Court informed of all important circumstances regarding their pending applications (see, for example, Bekauri

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616DEC003213310

Admin. suprême

16 juin 2015

16 juin 2015

At the same time, the Court considers the existence of those proceedings directly relevant to the present application because they comprised essentially the same claim and its resolution in the civil proceedings

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0128DEC004429121

Admin. suprême

28 janvier 2025

28 janvier 2025

prison and for the same, or substantially the same, period.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0516DEC000239422

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2023

16 mai 2023

by the same lawyer and their requests had the same object and were based on the same domestic order, the institution of separate sets of “Pinto” proceedings amounted to an abuse of rights as it did not

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD001410202

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2012

10 avril 2012

In the case of Bekauri v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0405DEC005607921

Admin. suprême

5 avril 2022

5 avril 2022

    On 26 November 2021 the applicant lodged the present application with the Court complaining of the excessive length of the same proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1031DEC000722222

Admin. suprême

31 octobre 2023

31 octobre 2023

With reference to judicial premises and prisons, section 9- quinquies and section 9- sexies of Decree-Law no. 52/2021 imposed the same conditions on both judges and administrative staff.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0128DEC006041909

Admin. suprême

28 janvier 2014

28 janvier 2014

These complaints are linked to the same proceedings in respect of which he complains about the excessive length. THE LAW A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0904DEC002871305

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 2012

4 septembre 2012

Subsequently, he enrolled in two other faculties of the same university, as described below (Chapters   2 and 3). 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0906DEC003837420

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2022

6 septembre 2022

On the same date the applicant was admitted to Yerevan-Kentron detention facility. 6 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1201DEC004550399

Admin. suprême

1 décembre 2009

1 décembre 2009

On the same day his unit took up position at Praxandros Stadium in Kyrenia.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-149175

Admin. suprême

1 décembre 2014

1 décembre 2014

    Later in the evening of the same day, at around 8.00 p.m., the arrested applicants were tried by the Tbilisi City Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0127DEC005027121

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2026

27 janvier 2026

However, the court found it “categorically established that the applicant had sustained, at the same time and in the same place, the same type of bodily harm”, namely under Article 130 § 2 of the Criminal

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0924DEC000222804

Admin. suprême

24 septembre 2013

24 septembre 2013

    By a judgment delivered on the same date, the Vrancea County Court decided that the applicant’s preliminary objection would be examined at the same time as the merits of the case, and invited

Source officielle

Page 2 sur 5

← PrécédentSuivant →