In the case of Minasyan and Geravetyan v. Armenia, The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Georgios A.

Commissaire du gouvernement ; Considérant qu'il résulte de l'instruction, notamment du rapport d'expertise, que le le lien de causalité entre les infiltrations d'eau qui affectent la maison de Mlle MINETIAN

Did the applicants have a “possession” within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see Minasyan and Semerjyan v. Armenia , no. 27651/05) §§ 52-56, 23 June 2009)?

    For a summary of the relevant domestic provisions related to the right of use of accommodation see the judgment in the case of Minasyan and Semerjyan v.

    For a summary of the relevant domestic provisions see the judgment in the case of Minasyan and Semerjyan v. Armenia (no. 27651/05, §§ 23-25, 23 June 2009). THE LAW I.

    For a summary of the relevant domestic provisions see the judgment in the case of Minasyan and Semerjyan v. Armenia (no. 27651/05, §§ 23-25, 23 June 2009). THE LAW I.

In the case of Minasyan v.

In particular, was the expropriation in compliance with domestic law, namely section 21(3) of the Municipal Property Act (see Minasyan and Semerjyan v.

de faux, de ce que l'officier public dit avoir personnellement accomplis ou constatés ; qu'en l'espèce, les époux [H] faisaient valoir (conclusions page 8) que le cautionnement au profit de la SCI Minaguan

  En l’affaire Makuchyan et Minasyan c.

text-indent:28.35pt } Résolution CM/ResDH(2015)191 Exécution des arrêts de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme Huit affaires contre Arménie   Requête n o Affaire Arrêt du Définitif le 27651/05 MINASYAN

    For a summary of the relevant domestic provisions see the judgment in the case of Minasyan and Semerjyan v. Armenia (no. 27651/05, §§ 23-35, 23 June 2009). COMPLAINTS 15.

On 31 May 2014 all the applicants, except applicants Minasyan and Arustamyan, requested a retraction from the president of the editorial board of the newspaper, Mr H.B., who was also a member of Parliament

    For a summary of the relevant domestic provisions see the judgment in the case of Minasyan and Semerjyan v. Armenia (no. 27651/05, §§ 23-35, 23 June 2009). COMPLAINT 14.

    For a summary of the relevant domestic provisions see the judgment in the case of Minasyan and Semerjyan v. Armenia (no. 27651/05, §§ 23-43, 23   June 2009). THE LAW I.

    The first applicant, Mrs Eleonora Minasian, her husband G.

    For a summary of the relevant domestic provisions see the judgment in the case of Minasyan and Semerjyan v. Armenia (no. 27651/05, §§ 23-25, 23 June 2009). THE LAW I.

avocat au barreau de MARSEILLE Monsieur [N] [M], demeurant [Adresse 4] représenté par Me Jérôme LATIL de la SCP LATIL PENARROYA-LATIL, avocat au barreau d'AIX-EN-PROVENCE, assisté par Me Alain MINASSIAN

Case Judgment of Final on 27651/05 MINASYAN AND SEMERJYAN 23/06/2009 07/06/2011 23/09/2009 07/09/2011 5065/06 HOVHANNISYAN AND SHIROYAN 20/07/2010 15/11/2011 20/10/2010 15/02/2012 13916/06 YERANOSYAN AND