CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1211DEC002316004
11 décembre 2006
On 21 November 2002 the Novogorodivskiy Town Court (the “Novogorodivskiy Court”) ordered the Novogorodivska State Mine (the “Mine”) to pay the applicant UAH 4,165.26 [1] in salary arrears and other
Page 2 sur 31
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1130DEC007268201
30 novembre 2004
In August 2000 the applicant instituted proceedings in the Lisichansk City Court against the Melnikov mine (a State-owned enterprise) to recover unpaid salary.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1127DEC002890504
27 novembre 2006
By decisions of 23 May and 7 October 2003, the Novogorodivskiy Town Court (the “Novogorodivskiy Court”) ordered the Novogorodivska State Mine (the “Mine”) to pay the applicant UAH 5,672.05 [1] in
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0607DEC000548302
7 juin 2005
On 13 February 2001 the Kuybyshevsky Local Court ordered the State mine “Zhovtnevyi Rudnik” to pay the applicant UAH 3,876.01 in salary arrears and compensation.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0211JUD008296817
11 février 2020
Size of deductions to be taken from debtor’s salary or other income “1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0522DEC000265704
22 mai 2006
In 1998 the applicant instituted two separate sets of proceedings in the Lysychansk Town Court against the Melnikov State Mine, seeking recovery of salary arrears.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4002
1 février 2005
.) - 73316/01 Decision 1.2.2005 [Section II] Article 4 Article 4-1 Servitude Article 4-2 Forced labour Foreign minor forced by private individuals to work without payment and rest: admissible The
5 / 3 SSR
CETAT:CETATEXT000007833633
13 janvier 1992
X..., propriétaire d'un parc zoologique à Sanary-sur-Mer, ont été provoqués par les travaux de construction de l'autoroute B 52 et par l'implantation de l'ouvrage public à proximité immédiate du parc zoologique
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1108DEC000559903
8 novembre 2005
On 20 January 1999 the Labour Disputes Commission of the State Joint-Stock Company Novogrodovskaya mine (Комиссия по трудовым спорам ГОАО шахта 1/3 «Новогродовская») adopted two decisions by which it ordered
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1210JUD006309316
10 décembre 2020
On the basis of the applicant’s challenge to the penalty notice, summary minor-offence proceedings were opened before the Rijeka Minor Offences Court. 9 .
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0411DEC004368321
11 avril 2023
particular Law no. 106/2002, provided for two types of firefighters: municipal firefighters ( bombeiros municipais ) and “sapper” firefighters ( bombeiros sapadores ), the latter receiving a higher salary
ECLI:CEDH:002-14122
22 juin 2023
to the average salary in the non‑commercial sector of the domestic economy.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0502JUD006027209
2 mai 2017
It had also noted that he had been a minor at the time.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1122DEC001768702
22 novembre 2005
On 15 November 2001, following the appeal of the coal mine, the Donetsk Regional Court of Appeal upheld this decision.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0405JUD001439702
5 avril 2005
On 19 January 2000 the Krasnoarmeysk City Court ordered the State mine “Rodinskaya” (the “Mine”) to pay the applicant UAH 2,961.35 [1] in compensation for salary arrears.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0519JUD001110323
19 mai 2026
By contrast, employees are expressly entitled to a salary and to compensation for their salary during periods of absence from work under the Labour Act (see paragraph 17 above).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1221JUD004248004
21 décembre 2006
They are former employees of the State Mining Company Novopavlivska (“the Mine,” ДП шахта „Новопавлівська” ). 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0405DEC003062302
In 2001, the applicant instituted proceedings in the Novogrodovsky City Court of the Donetsk Region against the “Novogrodovskaya” Mining Company - a State-owned enterprise - to recover unpaid salary for
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-223893
28 février 2023
The applicants filed recourses to challenge their salary and pension deductions arguing, inter alia , that Law 168(I)/2012 had been unconstitutional, as it placed a restriction on their right to property
REFERES
68e0321774e929a9d8fc56dd
3 octobre 2025
de la Vierge - 30300 COMPS Rep/assistant : Me Cyrille LA BALME, avocat au barreau de TOULON Grosses délivrées le : 03/10/25 à : Me Thierry GARBAIL - 1023 Me Cyrille LA BALME - 1031 Me Olivier MINO