The Latvian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs. I. Reine, The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

The Latvian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs I.   Reine. The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

October 2009, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Ms Olga Bačilova, is a Latvian

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête et des mémoires, enregistrés le 4 janvier 2021, le 9 mars 2022 et le 25 mai 2022, la société Compagnie des eaux et ozone (CEO), représentée par Me Laridan,

The Latvian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs I.   Reine. The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

However, following the break-up of the Soviet Union and the restoration of Latvian independence in 1991 they became stateless.

The Latvian authorities refused to regularise their immigration status and took steps to have them expelled.

The Latvian authorities refused to regularise their immigration status and took steps to have them expelled.

The Latvian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs I.   Reine. The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

The Latvian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs I. Reine. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

under Section 73 of the Latvian Penal Code.

.-56890 ST AVE Partie civile, appelant Non comparante, représentée par Maître LAUDRAIN Philippe, avocat au barreau de VANNES LE MINISTÈRE PUBLIC Appelant, COMPOSITION DE LA COUR : lors des

The Latvian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs I.   Reine. The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

The Latvian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs I.   Reine. The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

The Latvian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs I. Reine. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

The Latvian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs I.   Reine. The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

The Latvian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs I.   Reine. The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

  Principal facts   The applicants are Father Ivans (Ioanns) Miroļubovs, a Latvian national, Sergejs Pičugins, a “permanent resident non-citizen” of Latvia and Albīna Zaikina, also a Latvian

DE TOULOUSE ORDONNANCE DE RÉFÉRÉ DU 04 JUILLET 2025 DEMANDERESSE Mme [H] [N], demeurant [Adresse 6] représentée par Me Frédéric LANGLOIS, avocat au barreau de TOULOUSE DÉFENDERESSE SARL LAURANNE