Detention as an administrative suspect: the applicant remained in detention after the offence record had been compiled (see Korneyeva v.

Detention as an administrative suspect: the applicant remained in detention after the offence record had been compiled (see Korneyeva v.

assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva

  27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no.

See Korneyeva v. Russia , no. 72051/17, §§ 55-65, 8 October 2019.

that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 §   1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva

Russia , nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v.

  27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v.   Russia , no.   72051/17, §   34, 8   October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v.

assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva

  27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no.   72051/17, §   34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.

assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva

  54381/08 and 5   others, §§ 115-31, 10   April 2018, and Korneyeva v.   Russia , no.

The authorities’ failure to comply with those requirements, in the Court’s view, led to it finding a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention (see, in particular, Korneyeva v.

  27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v.

  54381/08 and 5   others, §§ 115-31, 10   April 2018, and Korneyeva v.   Russia , no.

xa0; 50271/06 and 8   other applications, §   35, 2 July 2019), Detention as an administrative suspect: the applicant remained in detention after the offence record had been compiled (see Korneyeva

The authorities’ failure to comply with those requirements, in the Court’s view, led to it finding a violation of Article   5   §   1 of the Convention (see, in particular, Korneyeva v.

Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5   others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018) , Detention as an administrative suspect: the applicant remained in detention after the offence record had been compiled (see Korneyeva

Detention as an administrative suspect: the applicant remained in detention after the offence record had been compiled (see Korneyeva v.