Ukraine , no. 72286/01, § 94, 28 March 2006, and Goginashvili v. Georgia , no. 47729/08, § 70, 4 October 2011).

Georgia , no. 10799/06, §   61, 8 January 2013, and Goginashvili , cited above, §§ 71-81). 33.

poor material conditions of detention in a Georgian prison, even if such a complaint did not call for the full and meticulous exhaustion of any specific criminal or civil remedies (compare with Goginashvili

Georgia (dec.), no. 1704/06, 27 June 2007) and for which no effective remedies, as established by the Court, existed at the material time (see Goginashvili v.

this regard, the Court notes that there already exists a well-established case-law, including that against Georgia, concerning the lack of adequate medical treatment in prison (see, for instance, Goginashvili

  47152/06, §§   135-140, ECHR 2016, with further references); Goginashvili v.

exists an abundance of well-established case-law, including against Georgia, concerning lack of adequate medical treatment in prison and lack of effective remedies in this regard (see, for instance, Goginashvili

Having regard to the Court’s relevant case-law (see Goginashvili v. Georgia , no. 47729/08, §§ 51-60, 4   October 2011; see also Makharadze and Sikharulidze v. Georgia , no.

Georgia , no. 522/04, § 62 and 63, 13 January 2009, and Goginashvili v. Georgia , no.

Georgia , no. 522/04, § 62 and 63, 13 January 2009; and Goginashvili v. Georgia , no.

In this regard, the Court notes that there already exists a well-established case-law, including against Georgia, concerning lack of adequate medical treatment in prison (see, for instance, Goginashvili

Georgia , no. 9870/07, §§ 46-62, 24 February 2009; Goginashvili v. Georgia , no. 47729/08, §§ 57-61 and 71-81, 4   October 2011; Jeladze v.

    The relevant legal provisions concerning the protection of prisoners’ rights in the custodial institutions of Georgia at the material time are set out in the following judgments: Goginashvili

In this regard, it reiterates that there already exists well-established case-law on the issue of the lack of adequate medical treatment in prison (see, for instance, Goginashvili v.

inline-block } .sAE540E25 { width:21.87pt; display:inline-block } .s7DB8BC41 { width:183.09pt; display:inline-block }     THIRD SECTION             CASE OF GOGINASHVILI

in the assessment of the adequacy of the treatment it must be guided by the due diligence test, since the State’s obligation to cure a seriously ill detainee is one of means, not of result (see Goginashvili

détenus qui dénonçaient une absence de traitement médical un cadre judiciaire leur permettant de faire redresser directement et dans un bref délai leur grief tiré de l’article 3 de la Convention ( Goginashvili

    The relevant legal provisions concerning the protection of prisoners’ rights in custodial institutions of Georgia at the material time are set out in the following judgments: Goginashvili

    Having regard to the Court’s relevant case-law (see Goginashvili v.   Georgia , no. 47729/08, §§ 51-60, 4 October 2011, and Makharadze and Sikharulidze v.