As an activist of the “Emir” Foundation and as assistant to the M.P. [full name], she had obtained wide support from social organisations for the draft [law]... which was adopted by [Parliament] ...

–   the statements of the victim’s husband, who stated that he had beaten his wife in the past and that just before she had committed suicide, he had beaten her again; –   the statement of the

The Justices had suffered losses related to the collapse of the banks, Milestone had been vilified in the media for causing such losses and the general sentiment in society towards the applicant had been

The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present case (see Fedotova and Others v.

One of these doctors, Z.T., had been a colleague and friend of Mehmet Emin Ayhan and was subsequently killed in a similar manner.

the reader had been induced to believe that he had persuaded the police to harm someone, when all he had done was to file a report requesting that the anonymous letters and emails he had received be investigated

had been requested.

ÚS   3812/12), court practice had been inconsistent and both Articles   88a and 158d had been used to obtain the content of email communications.

I have informed Ms X of this by email. She has informed me by return of email that she will be abroad on 20 July 2015 in connection with her work ...

He maintained that, since the emails had been sent from his private account and since he had not had a relationship of dependency vis-à-vis UPyD, he could not have foreseen that his emails would be monitored

The parties had separated in 2008 and the applicant’s husband had moved out; in the same year he had started a new relationship with a woman.

The applicant Mr Emil Pocajt (application no. 4611/07) was born in 1980 and lives in Polzela. He was represented before the Court by Ms N. Freitag, a lawyer practising in Celje.

Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her correspondence, contrary to Article   8 of the Convention?   2.

period for making such submissions had been asked for.

Emin Yıldırım had accepted his apology without ever claiming that he had been beaten.

If that email account had indeed been important evidence, it remained unclear why the police had not seized L.M.’s computer until 30   January 2012, whereas the proceedings had been instituted more

He alleged that the applicant’s email had disseminated injurious statements about him. 14.

DUNOYER, Greffier ; Vu le courriel de Maître Philippe DUBOIS, conseil de la société HAPPY FRUITS FWI en date du 31 mars 2026 ; La société HAPPY FRUITS FWI ne souhaite plus poursuivre les opérations

-- Email [email protected] for more details   --><!-- Font changed to TimesRoman with size 9 --><!-- End of font TimesRoman with size 9 --><!