ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5   §   3 OF THE CONVENTION 6.     The applicants complained that their pre-trial detention had been unreasonably long.

They relied on Article   5   §   3 of the Convention, which read as follows: Article 5   §   3 “3.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 29.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5   §   3 OF THE CONVENTION 6.     The applicants complained that their pre-trial detention had been unreasonably long.

They relied on Article   5   §   3 of the Convention. 7.

They relied on Article   5   §   3 of the Convention. 7.

      ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 §§ 1 and 3 OF THE CONVENTION 9.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 43.

    On 29 November 2007 the application was communicated, under Articles 3, 5 and 8 of the Convention, to the Government.

There has accordingly been a violation of Article   5 §   3 of the Convention. III.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 34.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5   §   3 OF THE CONVENTION 30.

    The applicant alleged, in particular, that his pre-trial detention exceeded a “reasonable time” within the meaning of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention . 4.

They relied on Article   5   §   3 of the Convention, which reads as follows: Article   5   §   3 “3.

They relied on Article   5   §   3 of the Convention, which reads as follows: Article   5   §   3 “3.

    Accordingly, there has been a violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention. V.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 OF THE CONVENTION 66.

  69861/11, §§ 67-69, 5   November 2015). 60.     It follows that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention.

THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5   §3 OF THE CONVENTION 9.

He relied on Article 5 § 3 of the Convention. 4.     On 10 April 2017 the application was communicated to the Government.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5   §   3 OF THE CONVENTION 28.