It held, accordingly, that there had been a breach of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.

Court on 28 December 2009, on the grounds that there was a serious risk that the proceedings could be thwarted, either because the applicant would not appear for trial or would abscond or interfere with

    With regard to Mărgineni Prison, he stated that he had been detained there with twenty-four other detainees in a 2 x 6. sq. m. cell and that there had been no running water. 16.

They further claim that there exist no guarantees to safeguard their right to life in domestic law and that they were unlawfully and arbitrarily deprived of their liberty.

In the course of his arrest, the applicant told the officers that he was an official police doctor and that there must have been a mistake.

and that they are not inadmissible on any other grounds.

Sur le rapport de Mme Feydeau-Thieffry, conseiller référendaire, les observations de la SCP Fabiani, Luc-Thaler et Pinatel, avocat de Mme [C], et l'avis de Mme Caron-Déglise, avocat général, après débats

  35729/12, § 10, 17 December 2013) was introduced no earlier than 1   April 2006, that is, less than a month before the proceedings in the present case reached their end.

She claimed that her having been brought to the courtyard and kept there by the police for more than two hours had amounted to an arrest and breached Article   45 §   1   (1-2) and Article

The applicant also complained that his continued detention constitutes a heavier penalty than the one that was applicable at the time of the offence, contrary to Article 7 of the Convention.

Since there was no proof that he had made the documents, he could not be held liable for that.

Services à thé en métal (précieux ou non), porcelaine, faïence, grès ou autre matériel et tous accessoires (boule à thé, chauffe-théières, etc).

if they would have wished to, especially considering that the possibility of making civil claims in that framework entails several advantages for victims given that it avoids pursuing different interests

They were suspended on 2 July 1999. It appears that they were then reinitiated and discontinued at some point in 2001. 14.

    The applicant argued that there were significant differences between her situation and that of Mrs Klaas.

It is incumbent on the Government claiming non-exhaustion to satisfy the Court that the remedy was an effective one available in theory and in practice at the relevant time, that is to say, that it was

They noted that judgment no. 74941/2001 of the Athens Criminal Court had been finalised on 5 August 2002 and that the decision of State Counsel at the Court of Cassation in response to the request for

Domestic courts had an obligation to examine whether there had been a breach of the reasonable time requirement and to provide adequate redress in the event that there had been such a breach. 23.

If they are, in other words if [the RMO] rather than [Dr G] is right, then I would hold that this treatment could be given to him.