CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

3 861 résultats pour « Stuart White »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0701DEC003676097

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 1998

1 juillet 1998

       On 15 November 1996 statements from the applicants were taken at the police headquarters.

Source officielle

Page 19 sur 194

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0921DEC000548002

Admin. suprême

21 septembre 2010

21 septembre 2010

    Death of the applicant's son On 2 September 1996 the applicant's son died while he was completing his military service as a private in the Bulgarian army (the “private”).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-150871

Admin. suprême

6 janvier 2015

6 janvier 2015

On 16 November 2004, while the proceedings were pending before the Supreme Court, the applicant became the new owner of the applicant company.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-114696

Admin. suprême

31 août 2011

31 août 2011

during what period?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0325JUD000260708

Admin. suprême

25 mars 2014

25 mars 2014

    On 21 March 2007 the Administrative Court of the Canton of Basel-Stadt ( Appellationsgericht des Kantons Basel-Stadt – hereinafter “the Administrative Court”) dismissed the applicant’s appeal

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0502DEC000395211

Admin. suprême

2 mai 2017

2 mai 2017

The military court ordered S.Ö.’s arrest after taking his statement. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-112348

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2011

7 juin 2011

What is most striking is the wide variation: many subjects have managed well, indeed some very well, while a not insignificant share are struggling with serious medical problems.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0209DEC001544208

Admin. suprême

9 février 2016

9 février 2016

I will start proceedings against you, I will see you!’ He was placed in cell no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7648

Admin. suprême

25 juillet 2013

25 juillet 2013

However, there had to be clear rules allowing the State to do this if the interference was not to be arbitrary.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-199537

Admin. suprême

25 novembre 2019

25 novembre 2019

Each time the police refused to open a criminal case and advised her to start private prosecution proceedings against Mr U. 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1026DEC001547202

Admin. suprême

26 octobre 2004

26 octobre 2004

    Factual background to the present case Norway has a State religion and a State Church, of which 86% of the population are members.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0911DEC005151912

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 2018

11 septembre 2018

    On 20 March 1996 the State, represented by the Zagreb Municipal State Attorney’s Office ( Općinsko državno odvjetništvo u Zagrebu ; hereinafter: the State), replied to the applicant’s civil

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0226DEC002614495

Admin. suprême

26 février 1996

26 février 1996

Two of these rooms are usually used for interrogation purposes while the third is the superintendent's room. Halil ikincisoy was called into one of the small rooms to make a statement.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0906DEC005764514

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2016

6 septembre 2016

; (b)     If “Yes”, “What is your verdict?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-906

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2010

1 juin 2010

While the applicant’s case could not be compared to other cases involving arbitrary acts of brutality by State agents, imposing almost token fines could not be considered an adequate response to a breach

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10145

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2014

23 octobre 2014

the State border on a regular flight despite border controls or had suddenly and inexplicably disappeared in Russia before almost immediately reappearing in his home country.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13596

Admin. suprême

15 mars 2022

15 mars 2022

Switzerland - 21881/20 Judgment 15.3.2022 [Section III] Article 11 Article 11-1 Freedom of peaceful assembly Blanket ban on public meetings for two and a half months at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:1208DEC001361188

Admin. suprême

8 décembre 1989

8 décembre 1989

  This decision was confirmed by the Stuttgart Court of Appeal (Oberlandesgericht) on 6 March 1978.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0913DEC002209793

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 1995

13 septembre 1995

  f) by failure to start building works or to terminate the authorised installation within the time-limit fixed in the permit or within any subsequently extended time-limit.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0126DEC003660608

Admin. suprême

26 janvier 2021

26 janvier 2021

which was still continuing, as it could only apply after that state had ceased to exist (see, for instance, Cyprus v.

Source officielle