The relevant provisions of the CCP and the relevant case-law of the Bulgarian Supreme Court have been summarized in paragraphs 38 and 39 of the Court’s judgment in the case of Shishkov v.

  Shitikov, a lawyer practising in Kaliningrad. The respondent Government are represented by Mr   P.

Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, § 140, 22 May 2012, and Shishkov v.   Bulgaria , no.   38822/97, §   66, ECHR 2003-I).

    The applicants were represented before the Court by Mr   Christian   Shumkov, a lawyer practising in Umeå.

Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see Shishkov v. Bulgaria , no.

Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see Shishkov v. Bulgaria , no. 38822/97, § 66, ECHR 2003 ‑ I (extracts)).

Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see Shishkov v. Bulgaria , no.   38822/97, § 66, ECHR 2003-I).

according to its case-law, Article 5 § 4 enshrines, as does Article 6 § 1, the right of access to a court, which can only be subject to reasonable limitations that do not impair its very essence (see Shishkov

Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see Shishkov v.

Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see Shishkov v.

Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see Shishkov v.   Bulgaria , no. 38822/97, § 66, ECHR 2003-I).

Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see, for example, Shishkov v.

Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see Shishkov   v. Bulgaria , no.

The Court considers that his detention in the Berdsk IVS should therefore be regarded as a “continuing situation” (see Shishkov v. Russia , no.

according to its case-law, Article 5 § 4 enshrines, as does Article 6 § 1, the right of access to a court, which can only be subject to reasonable limitations that do not impair its very essence (see Shishkov

Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see Shishkov v.   Bulgaria , no.

Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see Shishkov v. Bulgaria , no. 38822/97, §   66, ECHR 2003-I). 82.

Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see Shishkov v.

    As to the Government’s argument that he had spent only a relatively short period in pre-trial detention, the applicant emphasised, relying on Shishkov v.