The applicant alleged that he had been kept in conditions of poor hygiene in overcrowded cells.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 8 of the Convention 6.     The applicants complained of the permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 6.

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 11.

Hungary, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Gilberto Felici , President ,   Péter Paczolay,   Raffaele Sabato , judges , and Attila

Poland, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Péter Paczolay , President ,   Gilberto Felici,   Raffaele Sabato , judges , and Viktoriya

Poland, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Péter Paczolay , President ,   Gilberto Felici,   Raffaele Sabato , judges , and Viktoriya

Poland, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Péter Paczolay , President ,   Gilberto Felici,   Raffaele Sabato , judges , and Viktoriya

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   6 § 1 Of THE CONVENTION 9.     The applicant complained about the delayed enforcement of the 2014 judgment.

Poland, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Péter Paczolay , President ,   Gilberto Felici,   Raffaele Sabato , judges , and Viktoriya

Poland, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Péter Paczolay , President ,   Gilberto Felici,   Raffaele Sabato , judges , and Viktoriya

Poland, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Péter Paczolay , President ,   Gilberto Felici,   Raffaele Sabato , judges , and Viktoriya

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION 17.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 2 OF THE CONVENTION 48.

The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the alleged ill-treatment were communicated to the Azerbaijani Government (“the Government”).

The applicant’s complaints under Articles 3 and 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the alleged ill-treatment and unfairness of the criminal proceedings against him were communicated to the Azerbaijani

The applicant’s complaints under Article 14 taken in conjunction with Article 3 (substantive and procedural limbs), concerning the alleged ill ‑ treatment of the applicant by the police, ineffective

Romania, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Georges Ravarani, President,   Marko Bošnjak,   Péter Paczolay, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 6.