Article 2 : Le surplus des conclusions de la requête de la société Milhaud est rejeté.

Mme B, agent de la commune de Milhaud, a été victime d'un malaise, le 19 décembre 2018, suite à une altercation avec ses supérieurs hiérarchiques.

LA COUR DE CASSATION, PREMIÈRE CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le moyen unique : Attendu, selon l'arrêt attaqué (Orléans, 9 juillet 2012), que la SCP de notaires Delille et Millard

Law no. 357 (“the Military Legal Service Act”) Section 22 (c) of the Military Legal Service Act provides: “Irrespective of length of service, servicemen whose continued presence in the armed forces is

Law no. 357 (“the Military Legal Service Act”) Section 22 (c) of the Military Legal Service Act provides: “Irrespective of length of service, servicemen whose continued presence in the armed forces is

Law no. 357 (“the Military Legal Service Act”) Section 22 (c) of the Military Legal Service Act provides: “Irrespective of length of service, servicemen whose continued presence in the armed forces is

İLHAN against Türkiye lodged on 23 July 2019 and 3 September 2019 respectively communicated on 7 March 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern civil proceedings before the Supreme Military

In that connection, the Government are requested to inform the Court whether the military officers who sit on the bench of the Supreme Military Administrative Court remain subject to military discipline

The court further noted that the Law on Military Service provided for exemption from military service in the event of a parent’s death in the course of performing military duties, whereas the applicant

forces involved in war hostilities in the country: violation   Facts – During the 1980s, the applicant had worked as a lecturer at a military school based in Sarajevo and was allocated a military

the Ankara Military Hospital. 6.

on the bench of the Supreme Military Administrative Court remained under the hierarchy of the military authorities and did not enjoy the same judicial guarantees as the other military judges.

In spring 2006 the first applicant received an order to report for military service from the Sabail District Military Commission.

referred to the Grand Chamber on 11 May 2010] Facts – The applicant, a Jehovah’s Witness who had been declared fit for military service, informed the authorities that he refused to serve in the military

officer who had been dismissed from the armed forces, was tried and eventually sentenced to ten months’ imprisonment by the General Staff Court for having infringed the military regulations on leave.

penal code and the law on military penal procedure, as they were in force in Switzerland since 1 January 1980, had substituted for the Chief Military Prosecutor, as the ultimate appeal authority, a court

Peculiarities of the status of the military judges 1.     Judges of the military courts shall be military servicemen and shall be on staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. 2.

Law no. 357 (“the Military Legal Service Act”) Section 22 (c) of the Military Legal Service Act provides: “Irrespective of length of service, servicemen whose continued presence in the armed forces is

In particular, the Military Court held as follows: “... Kh.

The applicant started his military career in 1989.