Furthermore, the Government observed that the need to protect the public interest may justify withholding certain evidence from the defence in criminal proceedings ( Edwards and Lewis v.

For this reason it considers it appropriate to examine the applicant's complaint under the two provisions taken together (see, Edwards v. the United Kingdom , 16 December 1992, § 33, Series A no. 247 &

This procedural obligation is not an obligation as to result but as to means only (see Paul and Audrey Edwards , cited above, § 71). 58.

    The Court reiterates that this procedural obligation is not an obligation of result but of means only (see Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom , no.

; may apply in situations concerning the requirement of personal protection of one or more individuals identifiable in advance as the potential target of a lethal act (see Osman and Paul and Audrey Edwards

  29392/95, § 109, ECHR 2001 ‑ V; Paul and Audrey Edwards , cited above, §   97; Dölek v. Turkey , no.   39541/98, § 96, 2 October 2007; and Poghosyan and Baghdasaryan v.

In this connection the Court reiterates that persons in custody, as was the applicant, are in a vulnerable position and the authorities are under a duty to protect them (see Paul and Audrey Edwards , cited

    The Court further notes that in Edward and Cynthia Zammit   Maempel (cited above, § 82) where eviction was not necessary as the property had already been abandoned by the tenants, the

    The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points

Turkey , no. 23423/94, § 108, 21 February 2002 and, by contrast, Edwards v. the United Kingdom , judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247 ‑ B, p. 12, §   34 and Vidal v.

It originated in an application (no. 26614/95) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) under former Article 25 by Mr Edward Humen, a Polish

Irinel Popa (6289/03), Dorinel Popa (6297/03), Eduard Colos et M mes Ioana Simona Moroca et Georgeta Pricopoaea (9115/03) («   les requérants   »), ont saisi la Cour le 24 janvier 2003 (6289/

    The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points

    The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points

Gravata Rodrigues 6 250 16 Maria do Carmo Ribeiro Alves Rodrigues Casanova 6 250 17 Maria Isabel Barreto Gomes da Silva 6 250 18 Maria Leonor da Costa Filipe Pereira dos Santos 6 250 19 Maria Natércia

applicable at the date of settlement; (b)   that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal

applicable at the date of settlement; (b)   that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal

    La Cour juge approprié de calquer le taux des intérêts moratoires sur le taux d'intérêt de la facilité de prêt marginal de la Banque centrale européenne majoré de trois points de pourcentage

  32-33, §   32; Edwards v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no.   247-B, §   34). 50.