CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

29 963 résultats pour « Bechaud »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-224024

Admin. suprême

10 mars 2023

10 mars 2023

According to that decision, it was not necessary that the applicant be heard because the findings of the medical commission were sufficient to justify her compulsory admission in the psychiatric ward.

Source officielle

Page 19 sur 1499

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2004

Admin. suprême

29 avril 2008

29 avril 2008

case, which fell within the exclusive jurisdiction of the French courts, and because in turning to the American courts the applicant had attempted to circumvent the law and obtain the divorce the French

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-113086

Admin. suprême

31 août 2009

31 août 2009

On 25 September 2005 the applicant lodged a request to delete the conviction of Article 209 from the criminal record because Article 209 had been repealed in the meantime.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0624DEC004600499

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2003

24 juin 2003

The hearing scheduled for 8 September 1999 was adjourned because of an illness of a court expert.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0628DEC004991199

Admin. suprême

28 juin 2001

28 juin 2001

On 4 January 1999 the court adjourned a hearing because of the applicant’s illness.

Source officielle
CC

civ1

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2013:C100718

Cassation

3 juillet 2013

3 juillet 2013

X... alias Y..., qui avait participé, le 18 septembre 1979, en tant que soliste, à une séance d'enregistrement de l'oeuvre musicale " Just because of you ", chanson destinée à intégrer la bande sonore

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-161642

Admin. suprême

22 février 2016

22 février 2016

The court concluded that the applicants presented such risks because they were charged with an exceptionally serious crime and because the investigation was in its initial phase.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0618DEC002390320

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2024

18 juin 2024

    In March 2023 the Supreme Court granted the applicant leave to appeal and, in a judgment of 29 November 2023, held that her human rights had been violated because Finnish legislation did

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0323DEC005417200

Admin. suprême

23 mars 2006

23 mars 2006

The applicant’s statement was the following: “I do not want to leave prison because other things are happening.

Source officielle
TCOM

PREMIERE CHAMBRE AUDIENCE PUBLIQUE

69f48380cdc6046d4732fdd4

Commerce

27 avril 2026

27 avril 2026

COMMERCE DE CASTRES PREMIERE CHAMBRE JUGEMENT DU 27 AVRIL 2026 Le Tribunal de Commerce de CASTRES, après que la cause ait été débattue en audience publique le 19 janvier 2026 par-devant Monsieur Paul BERTHAUD

Source officielle
TCOM

PREMIERE CHAMBRE AUDIENCE PUBLIQUE

6a196fadcdc6046d475af15a

Commerce

18 mai 2026

18 mai 2026

COMMERCE DE CASTRES PREMIERE CHAMBRE JUGEMENT DU 18 MAI 2026 Le Tribunal de Commerce de CASTRES, après que la cause ait été débattue en audience publique le 04 mai 2026 par-devant Monsieur Paul BERTHAUD

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0906DEC001769602

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2005

6 septembre 2005

On 26   April 2002 the court returned the applicant’s complaint because it did not comply with the procedural requirements prescribed by law.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1112DEC002459913

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 2019

12 novembre 2019

this would not have allowed for any flexibility if the child was unavailable at a particular time, on account of her state of health or because of other reasons. 7 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1222JUD001498304

Admin. suprême

22 décembre 2005

22 décembre 2005

    Of the four hearings listed between 5 April 2000 and 28 February 2001, three hearings were adjourned because the defendants did not attend and one hearing was adjourned because the judge

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-218714

Admin. suprême

4 juillet 2022

4 juillet 2022

The applicants participated in both civil and the ensuing enforcement proceedings as interested third parties on the side of the municipality because the road in question enabled them to access their properties

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-237740

Admin. suprême

27 septembre 2024

27 septembre 2024

He submitted, among other things, that he had previously been imprisoned in Syria because of his oppositional activities; that he was still of interest to the Syrian authorities; and that he had been called

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-221851

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2022

22 novembre 2022

2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the decision of the domestic courts to declare inadmissible the applicant’s civil action to have certain material defects of her flat remedied because

Source officielle
CC

civ1

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2008:C100224

Cassation

22 mai 2008

22 mai 2008

qui sont identiques : Attendu que Mme X... a reçu, les 8 novembre et 21 décembre 1995, deux injections du vaccin anti-hépatite B, Engerix B, fabriqué par le laboratoire pharmaceutique Smithkline Beecham

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-211634

Admin. suprême

15 juillet 2021

15 juillet 2021

applicant in respect of her accessory appeal concerning the care order and the applicant’s not having appealed against that decision, is any part of her application lodged with the Court inadmissible because

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0531DEC002655010

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2011

31 mai 2011

She claimed that, as an out “butch” lesbian who dressed like a man, she would be at risk in Zimbabwe, not only from her family, but also from the wider community because of their attitude towards gays

Source officielle