They had decided to search her bag because such action “was compatible with the law”. P.

, soins hygiéniques et de beauté, manucure.

The experts suggested that the children be removed from their mother because she was harming their emotional development.

The applicants in Sîrbu and Others are: Pavel Sîrbu, Petru Bragoi, Vitalie Cornovan, Gheorghe Bragoi, Alexandru Usatîi and Iulian Guştiuc born respectively in 1956, 1966, 1965, 1955, 1961 and 1954.

The domestic courts found the accused guilty of the offences by a judgment of 29 March 2013, which became final on 9 January 2014. II.     RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW A.

, Alexandra, 1/8 ab indivisio.

The second applicant, Ms Alexandra Krejzová, was born in 1980 and lives in Prague. A.     Application lodged by Ms Šárka Dubská 7.

On 13 May 2014 a Chamber of that Section, composed of Isabelle Berro ‑ Lefèvre, Khanlar Hajiyev, Julia Laffranque, Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, Erik Møse, Ksenija Turković, and Dmitry Dedov, judges

The Government also argued that applications nos. 48707/18, 1191/20, 1420/20 and 6613/20 must be rejected in part as incompatible ratione personae with the provisions of the Convention, because the applicants

If either before or during the trial it became apparent that a duty to disclose had arisen, but that disclosure would not be in the public interest because of the sensitivity of the material, the prosecution

In pursuing his claim he became involved, either directly or indirectly, in a series of civil and criminal proceedings, the last of which ended in 2005.

They are continuously prevented from entering the northern part of Cyprus because of their Greek-Cypriot origin.

    The Government argued that the complaint was incompatible ratione materiae with the provisions of the Convention because Article 6 had not applied to the proceedings in question.

    On 17 September 2007 the Zagreb County Court dismissed the appeal by the applicant’s children and upheld the first-instance judgment, as a result of which it became final. 15.

Chamber composed of: Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Nina Vajić,   Anatoly Kovler,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

This interpretation became settled domestic case-law, also upheld by the plenary session of the Court of Cassation ( Sezione Unite ), which in 2001 found that, due to the enactment of other legislative

On 11   April 2019 the enforcement procedure was discontinued because the costs had been paid. 15 .

He considered that he should not lose his right to unemployment benefits because of circumstances beyond his control. 14.

    Lord Carnwath, with whom the other justices of the Supreme Court agreed, decided that the maxim generalia specialibus non derogant did not apply because neither section 80 nor section 66