He relied on Article   5   §   3 of the Convention, which reads as follows: Article   5   §   3 “3.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 23.

They relied on Article   5   §   3 of the Convention, which reads as follows: Article 5   §   3 “3.

They relied on Article 5   §   3 of the Convention, which read as follows: Article 5   §   3 “3.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 26.

He relied on Article   5   §   3 of the Convention, which reads as follows: Article   5   §   3 “3.

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5   §   3 OF THE CONVENTION 5.     The applicant complained that his pre-trial detention had been unreasonably long.

He relied on Article   5   §   3 of the Convention, which reads as follows: Article   5   §   3 “3.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 7.     The applicant complained about the lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for, and the length of, his pre-trial detention.

He relied on Article   5   §   3 of the Convention. 8.

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5   §   3 OF THE CONVENTION 6.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 37.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 30.

    The case concerns complaints under Articles 5 §§ 3 and 4 and Article   8 of the Convention. 2.

    The Government submitted that the length of the applicant’s detention was compatible with the standards under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention.

He relied on Article   5   §   3 of the Convention, which reads as follows: Article   5   §   3 “3.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5   §   3 OF THE CONVENTION 5.     The applicants complained principally that their pre-trial detention had been unreasonably long.

He relied on Article   5   §   3 of the Convention. 7.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 46.