CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

12 118 résultats pour « Wize »

Tous
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
CC
CE
TA
CAA
CA
CPH
TJ
TCOM
CJUE
Prud'h.
Conv. coll.
BOFIP
IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-212356

Admin. suprême

16 septembre 2021

16 septembre 2021

The applicants are husband and wife. They are parents to three daughters, born in 2009, 2016 and 2019.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-244208

Admin. suprême

17 juin 2025

17 juin 2025

In 2019 divorce proceedings were initiated between the applicant and his wife, but ultimately not followed up.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0327DEC002884807

Admin. suprême

27 mars 2018

27 mars 2018

In 2012, the applicant had received a separate flat for his wife and himself, while their son had remained living in Flat   A. 41.

Source officielle
TCOM

Chambre 02

69f61679cdc6046d475604cb

Commerce

14 avril 2026

14 avril 2026

Condamner la société WIZZ [Localité 4] HUNGARY KFT à payer la somme de 300,00€ par passager soit 600,00€ au titre de la résistance abusive.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0927DEC005158715

Admin. suprême

27 septembre 2022

27 septembre 2022

  In the case at hand, property of the applicant’s wife (who died in 2010 and of whom the applicant was a successor in title) situated in Sofia was expropriated in 1986.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0717JUD002192904

Admin. suprême

17 juillet 2008

17 juillet 2008

    On 29 February 2008 judgment was issued by the family court in favour of the applicant’s former wife.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-175527

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2017

19 juin 2017

    Killing of the applicant’s wife and surrounding circumstances At the material time the applicant and his wife, Ms Saniyat Magomedova, who was pregnant, resided in 83 Schorsa Street in Khasavyurt

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0303DEC001280787

Admin. suprême

3 mars 1988

3 mars 1988

  The applicant states that he tried to avoid provocation from his wife but that on one occasion he had to slap his wife to stop her from telling the son demeaning things about the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0910DEC002289709

Admin. suprême

10 septembre 2013

10 septembre 2013

The applicant’s wife and son were granted temporary admission on condition that his wife report to an immigration officer for interview on 21 March 2007.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1128DEC002389594

Admin. suprême

28 novembre 1994

28 novembre 1994

  The first applicant is married to the third applicant's sister; the second and third applicants' wives are sisters.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0707DEC002181403

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2009

7 juillet 2009

According to him, on 17   April 2002 an acquaintance, M., came to his flat to see his wife. As his wife was not home, M. left.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1128DEC002395894

Admin. suprême

28 novembre 1994

28 novembre 1994

       The applicant's wife is in part-time employment and earns approximately £60 (Irish) per week.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0304DEC006217500

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2003

4 mars 2003

On 19 February 1998 the applicant and his wife appealed.

Source officielle
CA

Pôle 6 - Chambre 7

64422a01d2fa6fd0f8040577

Appel

20 avril 2023

20 avril 2023

La société Telelangue est la société mère de deux filiales : - la SaRL à associé unique Networkeen (anciennement dénommée World Wide Speaking France), - la société World Wide Speaking Limited (ci-après

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0116JUD000631803

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2014

16 janvier 2014

    Death of the applicant’s wife 1.     Hospitalisation of the applicant’s wife 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1204JUD001889691

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 1995

4 décembre 1995

  He had been present at times at the interrogations of both the applicant and his wife.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1213DEC004323298

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2001

13 décembre 2001

The court found that the applicant’s former wife had failed to prove her animus donandi in respect of the remainder up to 4,657 convertible levs.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0122JUD003593910

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2013

22 janvier 2013

It was a form that was filled in and signed by the applicant’s wife as his guardian. 17.

Source officielle
CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:1986:153

CJUE

17 avril 1986

17 avril 1986

. # Failure of a State to fulfil its obligations - National rules on the production of quality wines produced in specified regions. # Case 116/82.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1204

Admin. suprême

1 décembre 2009

1 décembre 2009

The wife petitioned for divorce and was granted provisional, and subsequently full, custody of the child.

Source officielle

Page 18 sur 606

← PrécédentSuivant →