The applicant worked as an associate professor at the Polytechnic University of Valencia.

The same prescription of psychological counselling was made by a therapist prison doctor on 10 October and 13   December 2013, as well as on 10 April 2014.

    Some of the applicants also made submissions concerning factual and legal matters unrelated to the above non-enforcement issues. THE LAW I.

    Ms Valentyna Mykolayivna Mykhaylenko was born in 1951. Mr   Valentyn Andriyovych Mykhaylenko was born in 1944. Mr Grygoriy Stanislavovych Ganushevych was born in 1950.

    During the following years the applicants made numerous complaints to various authorities in the MRT and in Russia.

TRIBUNAL JUDICIAIRE DE VALENCIENNES POLE SOCIAL JUGEMENT DU HUIT JUILLET DEUX MIL VINGT QUATRE N° RG 22/00554 - N° Portalis DBZT-W-B7G-F4WK N° RG 23/00151 - N° Portalis DBZT-W-B7H-F6XJ (jonction) N°

It had not relied on further evidence to make findings to the detriment of the defendants to which the latter had not themselves confessed.

The investigation had failed to make any assessment of that point. 25.

However, when the domestic courts tried the case, they made a rather short analysis of the alleged incitement to commit the offence (see paragraph 6 above).

    The applicant crossed the Hungarian border clandestinely and made a request for asylum on 12 August 2014.

    On 9 September 2014 the applicant reappeared at the police station and made a formal complaint according to which the officers had brutally handcuffed and ill-treated him during and after

    The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the inordinate length of the substantive proceedings and further alleged that the award made by the Supreme Court had

  Violation of Article 6 § 1 (length) Violation of Article 13 in conjunction with Article 6 § 1 Valentin Ivanov v.

The Court finds that, following the applicants’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties.

The Montenegrin Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Valentina Pavličić.

The Montenegrin Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Valentina Pavličić.

The Montenegrin Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Valentina Pavličić.

The Montenegrin Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Valentina Pavličić.

The Montenegrin Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Valentina Pavličić.