CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 518 résultats pour « Thierry THAVE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CA

Pôle 6 - Chambre 5

603279956c6a03ad93284a5d

Appel

25 janvier 2018

25 janvier 2018

A l'encontre de ce jugement notifié le 14 février 2014, la société THALES AIR SYSTEMS a interjeté appel le 11 mars 2014.

Source officielle

Page 18 sur 126

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13874

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2022

18 octobre 2022

The fact that the applicants had mentioned that another accused person had apparently made use of one of the remedies provided for in Article   108 indicated that they had been aware of that possibility

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0427JUD004402508

Admin. suprême

27 avril 2010

27 avril 2010

they were censored. 34.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1112JUD000376911

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 2015

12 novembre 2015

They further noted that the mere fact that the investigative measures had not produced any specific results, or had produced only limited ones, did not mean that there were any omissions on the part of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0117DEC002267193

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 1997

17 janvier 1997

there.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0330JUD002440816

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2023

30 mars 2023

Since under domestic law anyone had the right to apply for admission to a school other than the one in their catchment area, the fact that he did not reside there could not have served as a valid reason

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1106JUD001390905

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 2007

6 novembre 2007

The District Court fully accepted the reasons given by the Municipal Court and added that, below the article at issue, there had been only the applicant's name and surname and no indication that it had

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0126DEC003833097

Admin. suprême

26 janvier 1999

26 janvier 1999

That the mortgage applicants intended personally to occupy the properties which they were proposing to purchase. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1024DEC002128002

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2006

24 octobre 2006

They referred to the other cases summarised above (see “Other similar cases”), maintained that these cases were similar to that of the applicant company and considered that such means of action were available

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1106DEC006003913

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 2018

6 novembre 2018

As to his constitutional complaint, the applicant argued that the primary reason for rejecting it had been the Constitutional Court’s position of principle, which he considered wrong, that there could

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0916DEC003501497

Admin. suprême

16 septembre 2003

16 septembre 2003

In particular, they considered that the applicant should, under Article 160 of the Code of Administrative Procedure, have sued the State Treasury for damages arising from the fact that the authorities

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0710JUD001652805

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2008

10 juillet 2008

    At the outset, the Court reiterates that an individual is not required to try more than one avenue of redress when there are several available.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0429JUD002508894

Admin. suprême

29 avril 1999

29 avril 1999

They asked the court to rule on that account that they were third parties in relation to the ACCAs concerned, that their land could no longer be included in the ACCAs’ hunting grounds and that the ACCAs

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1026DEC000307903

Admin. suprême

26 octobre 2004

26 octobre 2004

The applicant's solicitors asked that some witnesses be called to give oral evidence, including Sandra; in particular they asked that Barry Holt be called and that they be furnished with a list of his

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0427DEC004273502

Admin. suprême

27 avril 2004

27 avril 2004

The minister concerned can only exercise that power if he considers that there are 'compelling reasons' for doing so.”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0309DEC006481201

Admin. suprême

9 mars 2004

9 mars 2004

  It appeared that they would offer a far more therapeutic environment: they were spacious, and had good access to natural light and ventilation.”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0120JUD007033701

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2009

20 janvier 2009

The lawyer argued that there was no evidence against the applicant other than that obtained under ill-treatment. 21.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1011DEC004349602

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2005

11 octobre 2005

The Government maintained that such remedies were effective both in theory and in practice. The applicant did not comment on this.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0619DEC003459297

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2001

19 juin 2001

At that moment there were many children on the street. They ran approximately 150 or 200 meters. Afterwards I saw the young man falling on the ground. He was shot in the back.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1006DEC004521607

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2009

6 octobre 2009

The Federal Constitutional Court found, lastly, that there was no evidence that the ethics classes were not neutral.

Source officielle